Showing posts with label spacetime. Show all posts
Showing posts with label spacetime. Show all posts

Wednesday, November 26, 2025

Time Crystals For Sale


Maybe I should stop posting about time crystals. 
(I will never understand time crystals)

Physicists investigate dynamic phenomena of a time crystal
Apr 2025, phys.org

The crystal, made of indium gallium arsenide, was continuously illuminated with a laser during the initial experiment. This interaction caused a nuclear spin polarization, which in turn spontaneously generated oscillations, embodying the essence of a time crystal through periodic behavior under constant excitation. Then they illuminated the semiconductor periodically instead of continuously, while also varying the frequency of the periodic drive. The observed behavior of the time crystal, its frequency response, ranged from perfect synchronization to chaotic dynamics.

Synchronization occurs only at specific fractions of the system's natural frequency. These fractions, in order of appearance with increasing drive frequency, correspond to the "Farey tree sequence," a well-known hierarchical structure implemented in a crystal for the first time.

If the driving frequency is varied further, the end of the synchronization range is reached. Here, each frequency component splits into at least two branches that are symmetrical to the synchronization frequency. These frequency branches connect the synchronization plateaus and together form a kind of staircase, known in the literature as "the devil's staircase," indicating a path either upwards or downwards.

Note: The Devil's Staircase is ... sorry, can't figure that out either. The internet is broken, sure, but this is one of those things that's referred to by everyone, but never actually described by anyone. So basically the people who need to know what it is, already know what it is. Something to do with phase transitions of different materials put together.

via TU Dortmund University: Alex Greilich et al, Exploring nonlinear dynamics in periodically driven time crystal from synchronization to chaotic motion, Nature Communications (2025). DOI: 10.1038/s41467-025-58400-6


Physicists create a new kind of time crystal that humans can actually see
Sep 2025, phys.org

via University of Colorado at Boulder Renewable and Sustainable Energy Institute, and WPI-SKCM2 International Institute for Sustainability with Knotted Chiral Meta Matter at Hiroshima University: Hanqing Zhao et al, Space-time crystals from particle-like topological solitons, Nature Materials (2025). DOI: 10.1038/s41563-025-02344-1


Quantum clocks deliver navigation accuracy far beyond current GPS systems in naval tests
Jul 2025, phys.org

"Outperforms GPS navigation systems by many orders of magnitude"

The clocks designed by the team rely on sealed cells containing a low-pressure gas of atoms (rubidium). These cells are then interrogated with lasers at specific colors, and the information extracted is used to steer the laser wavelength to the atom—providing stability.

Both clocks are optical atomic clocks, using sealed cells containing a low-pressure gas of the elements rubidium and ytterbium.

via University of Adelaide Institute of Photonics and Advanced Sensing, (Austrialian) Defense Science and Technology Group, Quantx Labs: A. P. Hilton et al, Demonstration of a mobile optical clock ensemble at sea, Nature Communications (2025). DOI: 10.1038/s41467-025-61140-2


New theory proposes time has three dimensions, with space as a secondary effect
Jun 2025, phys.org

This is not exactly related to the "Kletetschka's 3-D Time Theory"

If you could step onto that sideways path and remain in the same moment of "regular time," you might find that things could be slightly different—perhaps a different version of the same day. Moving along this perpendicular second path could let you explore different outcomes of that day without going backward or forward in time as we know it.

The existence of those different outcomes is the second dimension of time. The means to transition from one outcome to another is the third dimension.

Oh but wait, wow - we get a revised editor's note, something I do not see often while perusing phys.org (actually I've never seen this before)

Publishing in Reports in Advances of Physical Sciences (World Scientific Publishing), while a legitimate step, is not sufficient for a theory making such bold claims. This journal is relatively low-impact and niche, and its peer review does not match the rigorous scrutiny applied by top-tier journals like Physical Review Letters or Nature Physics. For a paradigm-shifting idea to gain acceptance, it must withstand critical evaluation by the wider physics community, be published in highly regarded journals, and provide reproducible predictions that align with existing evidence—standards this work has not yet met. (Andrew Zinn, editor at ScienceX which contains phys.org)

via University of Alaska Fairbanks Geophysical Institute: Gunther Kletetschka, Three-Dimensional Time: A Mathematical Framework for Fundamental Physics, Reports in Advances of Physical Sciences (2025). DOI: 10.1142/S2424942425500045


World's most precise clock achieves 19-decimal accuracy with aluminum ion technology
Jul 2025, phys.org

The most accurate clock ever. For now!

via National Institute of Standards and Technology: Mason C. Marshall et al, High-Stability Single-Ion Clock with 5.5×10−19 Systematic Uncertainty, Physical Review Letters (2025). DOI: 10.1103/hb3c-dk28

Thursday, April 6, 2023

The Superluminal Observer


From the "rebel physicist" at University of Warsaw, and posted back in 2020, here's an attempt to explain what it's like to be the object that moves faster than light. 

Three time dimensions, one space dimension: Relativity of superluminal observers in 1+3 spacetime
Dec 2022, phys.org

The Superluminal World - Stretch your brain into this, the collapse of 3D space into 1D, or rather the flip from space to time dimensions.

I don't know why we had to wait for someone to say this, but why not? Why can't superluminal objects exist?

What happens when we assume—at least theoretically—that the world could be observable from superluminal frames of reference? There is a chance that this would allow the incorporation of the basic principles of quantum mechanics into the special theory of relativity. This revolutionary hypothesis of prof. Andrzej Dragan and prof. Artur Ekert from the University of Oxford presented for the first time in the article "Quantum principle of relativity" published two years ago in the New Journal of Physics. the latest conclusion is in the journal Classical and Quantum Gravity, titled "Relativity of superluminal observers in 1 + 3 spacetime", and is authored by a group of 5 physicists.

In their latest publication in the journal Classical and Quantum Gravity, titled "Relativity of superluminal observers in 1 + 3 spacetime", a group of 5 physicists goes a step further, presenting conclusions about the full four-dimensional spacetime.

via University of Warsaw and Center for Quantum Technologies of the National University of Singapore: Andrzej Dragan et al, Relativity of superluminal observers in 1+3 spacetime, Classical and Quantum Gravity (2022). DOI: 10.1088/1361-6382/acad60

Image credit: Neutron star merger - NASA's Goddard Space Flight Center, CI Lab - 2022


Post Script:
Time-synchronization is hard:
Network-crashing leap seconds to be abandoned by 2035, for at least a century
Nov 2022, Ars Technica

International Bureau of Weights and Measures (BIPM in its native French) just decided that Coordinated Universal Time, or UTC, would run without a leap second until 2135. 

Leap seconds in 2012 and 2017 caused multi-hour outages at companies including Reddit, Qantas, and Cloudflare. Many companies implemented a version of "leap smearing" to smooth out a leap second addition into micro-seconds spread across the globe throughout a day.


Thursday, March 24, 2022

Collapsing the Quantum Paradigm


Does relativity lie at the source of quantum exoticism?
Apr 2020, phys.org

No way; this paper, from a theoretical physicist at University of Warsaw (and who Wired is calling a rebel physicist), makes a claim that I'm finding hard to believe. It's not the claim that's hard to digest, it's the fact that it's so simple. 

They're telling us that if we just accept the fact that Einstein is wrong, and that there are things in the universe that travel faster than the speed of light, then quantum mechanics and relativistic physics can all get along just fine. 

"Einstein considered the second postulate (constant velocity of light) to be crucial. In reality, what is crucial is the principle of relativity."

Things move at three speeds -- at subluminal velocities, at the velocity of light, and at superluminal velocities.

Today, we say that the third option is magical thinking; not a part of reality. 

But listen -- 

If in one system at point A there is generation of a superluminal particle, even completely predictable, emitted towards point B, where there is simply no information about the reasons for the emission, then from the point of view of the observer in the second system events run from point B to point A, so they start from a completely unpredictable event. 

"We noticed, incidentally, the possibility of an interesting interpretation of the role of individual dimensions. In the system that looks superluminal to the observer some space-time dimensions seem to change their physical roles. Only one dimension of superluminal light has a spatial character —- the one along which the particle moves. The other three dimensions appear to be time dimensions," says Dr. Dragan.

A characteristic feature of spatial dimensions is that a particle can move in any direction or remain at rest, while in a time dimension it always propagates in one direction (what we call aging in everyday language). So, three time dimensions of the superluminal system with one spatial dimension (1+3) would thus mean that particles inevitably age in three times simultaneously. The ageing process of a particle in a superluminal system (1+3), observed from a subluminal system (3+1), would look as if the particle was moving like a spherical wave, leading to the famous Huygens principle (every point on a wavefront can be treated itself as a source of a new spherical wave) and corpuscular-wave dualism.

"All the strangeness that appears when considering solutions relating to a system that looks superluminal turns out to be no stranger than what commonly accepted and experimentally verified quantum theory has long been saying. On the contrary, taking into account a superluminal system, it is possible -— at least theoretically —- to derive some of the postulates of quantum mechanics from the special theory of relativity, which were usually accepted as not resulting from other, more fundamental reasons," Dr. Dragan concludes.

via Institute of Theoretical Physics, University of Warsaw; Centre for Quantum Technologies, National University of Singapore; Mathematical Institute, University of Oxford: Andrzej Dragan and Artur Ekert, Quantum principle of relativity, New Journal of Physics (2020). DOI: 10.1088/1367-2630/ab76f7

Just get over it -- things move faster than light, and you'll never be able to see them (not until you trade-in your meatbag body-capsule for an unencumbered and fully liberated constellation of semi-sentient, self-swarming photon clouds).


Saturday, January 26, 2013

Go Home Time, You're Drunk

Some places — labeled in red — have no time zone, and just observe Coordinated Universal Time, by default.

So this is what time zones look like in Antarctica
Robert T. Gonzalez, Jan 22, 2013
http://m.io9.com/5977955/so-this-is-what-time-zones-look-like-in-antarctica

time










Sunday, December 2, 2012

The Big Heap, Time and Network Configuration

recursive painting

As Lee Smolin tries to ask us, to ask ourselves, if, for interpreting quantum cosmological theory, there may be available a language that does not presume that time and change have meaning, he conjures Julian Barbour, who argues that clock-time cannot work in a quantum theory of gravity.

Julian Barbour's Big Heap:
Time has no fundamental meaning at all.

The universe is a great collection of moments, each one a snapshot of the universe, a simple configuration of things. This collection of all moments is The Heap.

The Heap contains a great many moments, but there is no sense in which the different moments can be ordered in time. They simply just are.

The quantum state of the universe serves only one function, which is to give the probability that any given moment may be found in this collection.

All physical laws reduce to one question: A godlike being reaches into the heap and pulls out a moment. What is the probability that such a randomly selected moment will have some particular characteristic? To describe this, we need no notion of time or change. Nothing is changing in time because there is no time - the whole heap just is.

Each moment is structured as to give us the impression that other moments also exist. We have memories as evidence that can only mean that other moments must have happened in the past, like "time capsules" (Barbour) - aspects of the configuration of a moment that speak to us of other moments.

Lee Smolin, The Life of the Cosmos, 1997, Oxford (p289)

Despite my paraphrasing, the words structure and configuration are used by Smolin, and hence, they do make us think about a big heap of things, or nodes, connecting to each other - a network. 

Filaments of Creation
Tom Theuns  /  Max Planck Institute for Astrophysics, 2010
In this computer model of the early universe, gravity arranges matter in thin filaments.

ON GRAVITY:
since we're talking about quantum cosmology

In his book, Bursts, A.L. Barabasi forces us to re-imagine time. It is not made of regular intervals; that is to say, people do not ‘do things’ at regular intervals. Instead, people do lots of things in short bursts of time, and then go for long durations doing nothing at all.

Our use of/working with social computational dynamics is forcing us to fine-tune the resolution of our time structures, revealing something akin to Einsteinian space. Some kind of strange gravity draws near to it (timewise) the bulk of our activities.

Muhammad ibn Musa al-Khwarizmi
aka Algo Rhythm
aka The Dimensional Liberator

ASIDE:
In logic, the time that an algorithm requires to complete cannot be measured, as it is not apparently related with our customary physical dimension.
(via wiki:Algorithm)

A.L. Barabasi, Bursts, 2010
A Bit on Networks
Bursts

(Another Aside)
...in a world of increasingly pervasive surveillance, location and identity are becoming all but inextricable:

New surveillance technology can track everyone in an area for several hours at a time
The Washington Post, Feb 2014