Showing posts with label psyops. Show all posts
Showing posts with label psyops. Show all posts

Monday, May 18, 2026

Edward Bernays


I've always wanted to read Bernays. I first heard of him on WBAI 99.5FM, a public radio station in New York City and under Pacifica, during their fundraiser, where they would play a documentary about the mass manipulation of populations, and offer to give it to you for free if you donated some money to the station. At that time, Bernays sounded like the most diabolical person ever. Today, we're in an age of digital mass manipulation, with non-human algorithms and predatory platforms, and so I thought maybe it's time I read the Bernays, from the source, and so I did. 

Now I realize that he was not a diabolical mastermind who manipulated every person on the planet for greed and power. He was trying to help the people talk to their government and to their corporate overlords. Granted, he did work for entities like Phillip Morris, and granted, audacious plots like the Carbon Footprint propagandized by British Petroleum were crafted in his spirit. And then there's the quote from the back of the book jacket of his second book Propaganda (copied below), which is nothing short of the most ominous and conspiratorial provocation ever. But in his own books, he's saying he does all this because he wants to see people understand each other. He doesn't only want the business he works for to make more money, he wants the customers they serve to be more satisfied at the same time. He doesn't just want a government to come up with some new laws, he wants those laws to actually be just what the people need, no more and no less. "The goal of all public relations is good will" (Public Relations, Bernays, 1952, p5). 

Maybe there's another piece to all this, some criticism written 20 years after he dies, that shows how I was so easily misled, and how he was in fact the sinister mental criminal the WBAI documentary presented him as. Maybe; but I'm not there yet. So for now, here it is.

Crystallizing Public Opinion
Edward Bernays, 1923 

This is his first book.

Something about "the danger of interference by the public in the conduct of the industry"; but his tone overall is one of cooperation, consideration, conscientiousness, etc., and for the public good just as much as the interests of industry, government, etc. p21

On Paul Revere vs Longfellow, and Perception vs Reality - based on a story in a "New York newspaper", about public relations (which was a new concept at the time by the way). Two other people rode with Paul Revere that night. "There were three waiting to see the signal hung in the tower of the Old North Church. Everyone of them mounted and spurred just as Mr. Longfellow described Paul Revere. They all got the signal. They all rode and waked the farmers, spreading the warning. Afterward, one of them was an officer in Washington's army, another became governor of one of the States. Not one in twenty thousand Americans ever heard the names of the other two, and there is hardly a person in America who does not know all about Revere. Did Revere make history or did Longfellow?" p22-23

On Influencing Public Opinion - or even on correcting misinformation, as the advice sounds very familiar. "It is seldom effective to call names or to attempt to discredit the beliefs themselves. The council on public relations, after examination of the sources of established beliefs, must either discredit the old authorities or create new authorities by making articulate a mass opinion against the old belief or in favor of a new one." And because he says the beliefs of individuals come from authorities, like the President of the United States, the president of the local school board, or the director of a finance committee; authorities are where the belief comes from, and people have allegiance to them; the allegiance is to other people, not to ideas or beliefs, but it appears as allegiance to belief. And therefore, you can't discredit the belief but the authority where it comes from. p30

In a chapter titled "The Interaction of Public Opinion with the Forces That Help Make It", he talks about the back-and-forth of the public opinion and public will on other systems, which then influence them back, etc., and he says, "Give the people what they want" is only half sound. What they want and what they get are fused by some mysterious alchemy. The press, the lecturer, the screen and the public lead and are led by each other." p38

He mentions often "the crowd" and "crowd-mind" and Everett Dean Martin's the Behavior of Crowds.

He refers to Instincts of Herd by Trotter to explain the behaviors of the group vs the individual.

On Dull News Days - he is referencing an article by the editors of the New York Tribune, April 19, 1922, "What Else Happened That Day", which is about the news on the day Austria declared war on Serbia, and which started World War One. First Bernays says when there is no big news, real editing is needed to select the real news from the semi-news. Then he says, "What you read on dull news days is what fixes your opinion of your country and of your compatriots. It is from the non-sensational news that you see the world and assess, rightly or wrongly, the true value of persons and events." And so Bernays is saying it is in this way, small yet unending, that our ideas are shaped. Not the big, single incidents; the ones you notice. It's the million little things, and so small you don't notice. Little by little you build your ideas, your beliefs. p51

Here citing Lippmann's "Public Opinion", there are 3 ways to "obtain cohesive force" of the public:
1. Patronage and Pork - a member of one community will promise reciprocal support to the member from another community
2. Government by Terror and Obedience - [no explanation is given]
3. Governments based on such highly developed systems of information, analysis and self-consciousness that the 'knowledge of national circumstances and reasons of state' is evident to all men. ... [T]he degree to which the material for a common consciousness exists determines how far cooperation will depend upon force, or upon the milder alternative to force, which is patronage and privilege. p56-57

On the Interlapping Group Formations in Society - let us examine for a moment the personnel of the Horseshoe at the Metropolitan Opera House. It is comprised of people who are rich, but this economic classification is only one, for the men and women who assemble there are presumably music lovers. But also ... art lovers ... sportsmen ... merchants and bankers ... philosophers ... motorists and amateur farmers. p63

And a silk firm trying to reach the public, targets women, propagandizing silk as fashion, as art, as the natural history of the silk worm ... p64

Citing Martin's "The Behavior of Crowds", "a debate will draw a larger crowd than a lecture." p68

The first picture I wanted to use seemed very obviously artificially generated, so I chose this one instead. I didn't look at the words printed at the bottom, until I did, and then I decided to just leave it for everyone to see. This is how hard it's become to find an actual original photo from that day.


This seems a bit more authentic?

Propaganda
Edward Bernays, 1928 

This is his second book.

On the back jacket, "Those who manipulate this unseen mechanism of society constitute an invisible government which is the true ruling power of our country." This sounds so ominous and conspiratorial, but not how he seemed to portray it? And so I might have to argue that even Bernays himself is saying that true power is part of the iterative creative force of a population acting on its governing bodies which then act back on the population which then act in response back on the governing bodies, ad infinitum; and so nobody rules anything, nobody ultimate controls anything.

His first book seems to be making the case for a public opinion expert, or public relations expert. Here, he's making the case for propaganda, which is the instrument of the public relations expert. 

The New Propagandists, a list: The President of the United States and the members of his Cabinet; the Senators and Representatives in Congress; the Governors of our forty-eight states; the presidents of the chambers of commerce in our hundred largest cities, the chairmen of the boards of directors of our hundred or more largest industrial corporations, the presidents of many of the labor unions affiliated in the American Federation of Labor, the national president of each of the national professional and fraternal organizations, the president of each of the racial or language societies in the country, the hundred leading newspaper and magazine editors, the fifty most popular authors, the presidents of the fifty leading charitable organizations, the twenty leading theatrical or cinema producers, the hundred recognized leaders of fashion, the most popular and influential clergymen in the hundred leadings cities, the presidents of our colleges and universities and the foremost members of their faculties, the most powerful financiers in Wall Street, the most noted amateurs of sport, and so on. p12

"Invisible government" and "mass psychology" - these are some mid-20th c. and early 21st c. buzzwords; were they buzzwords in 1920 when he wrote this?

He talks about the new industrial economy and says the new business is not to make more stuff, because we got that with the industrial revolution, "To make customers is the new problem" and his greater context here is inter-industry and inter-commodity competition. p30

Ultimately he seems to see it as a cooperation, and a "bringing order from chaos"

He also says beliefs you agree with are education, and beliefs you disagree with are propaganda, but that propaganda is its own thing, and a good propagandist can use it to influence public opinion to the benefit of both. 

AI Art - Mind Control - via stablediffusion

Public Relations
Edward Bernays, 1952 

This is his last book. Much of it is taken from previously published material, either his own earlier books, or news, journals, etc., articles written by him and others. I get somewhat of a feeling that he's being defensive of propaganda; this is written in 1952, where the whole world knows what it means, and what it can do. At his first book, circa 1920, the world, and the concept of 'propaganda' were both much different. 

"The goal of all public relations is good will" p5 

On Publicity vs Public Relations - "Publicity is a one-way street; public relations, a two-way street. The modern public relations man owes his being to the destruction of the laissez-faire in the early twentieth century; he owes it to the muckrakers of the period, the Square Deal, the New Freedom, and the New Deal." p5

Propaganda - "The term 'propaganda' was introduced when Pope Gregory XIII established a Committee for the Propagation of the Faith to found seminars and print catechisms and other religious works in foreign countries. Subsequently, Pope Urban VIII (1623-1644) founded the College of Propaganda to educate priests. In 1650 Pope Clement VII instituted the Congregation for the Propagation of the Faith to spread Catholicism the world over." p20

Public Opinion - the phrase is first used in the Enlightenment, which is after revolutions gave rights to public speech, freedom of presses, etc., and all as a result of literacy in the population. ... Rousseau's term volonte generale, or the "general will", and the German Volksgeist, or "spirit of the people", and Jeremy Bentham's "tribunal of public opinion" p22

"What is truly vicious is not propaganda but a monopoly of it." p24


PT Barnum would write letters to the editor of a newspaper, under pseudonyms, and both for and against PT Barnum. (This sounds like the Black Lives Matter movement circa 2018, and follows Bernays earlier advice that 'a debate is better than a lecture'; recall there were protests on both sides of the issue held at the same place and same time and started by the same organization but masquerading as two opposing organizations.) p38

During the period 1800-1865, slavery was the primary topic; he lists all the ways literature, magazines, etc. influenced public opinion, and that is where we see the first real reference to 'public relations', used by a rector in New York City, 1842 p46

Publicity vs Public Relations - it was called publicity, but in 1908, AT&T head used the word in the heading of the annual report. p70

Freud was the uncle of Bernays.

The Committee on Public Information of WWI (imagine that)

"The first use of "public relations counsel" was at the time of the Bernays wedding, "when the groom described himself by that phrase." Eric Goldman, Two-Way Street p91

"...separate proper from impropaganda" -Herbert Bayard Swope, executive manager of the New York World, 1922

[Relevant in Post-COVID 2025] Following the Great Depression, "Corporations and leaders had lost prestige simultaneously. From a market standpoint, the public was keenly sensitive, because of its feeling of insecurity, to everything about a corporation that it did not understand. ... sales of products fell off for the most improbably and unlikely reasons: false rumors, ... No possible subject that could be a matter of disagreement between groups of the public was too trivial to cause a wave of public disapproval or a falling off in buying. p92

The Institute for Propaganda Analysis, started by the Boston merchant Edward A. Filene, 1937, and published Propaganda Analysis, a monthly newsletter "to help intelligent citizens detect and analyze propaganda"

Classifications: 
  • the name-calling device
  • glittering generalities
  • transfer in terms of approved symbols and sanctions
  • testimonial
  • plain folks' device
  • card-stacking
  • bandwagon

A major distinction he makes is the one-way vs two-way streets; the one-way approach to public relations is what most people call sales. p122

The genius of radon watches - they were indispensable to soldiers on the front lines because they couldn't use lights to see their watches, so the radon watch was put on soldiers, and the soldiers were sold to the people, at a time when watches were still considered feminine. p129-130

"Engineering of Consent" is a chapter title, and pretty ominous sounding if you ask me.

He recommends all Public Relations Councils have a library of people and organizations, like the directory of newspapers, or the Congressional Directory...p162

He lists some of his processes
  • Research - survey people, write them letters
  • Appeal to Desire - aka "psychological raw materials", self preservation, ambition, pride, hunger, love of family and children, patriotism, imitativeness, the desire to be a leader, love of play
  • Symbols - Horses are the symbol for both Marlboro and Budweiser (jesus yes they are)
  • Do not think of tactics in segmented approaches; the problem is not to get articles into a newspaper or radio time or arrange for a motion-picture newsreel; it is rather to set in motion a broad activity, the success of which depends on interlocking all phases and elements of the proposed strategy, implemented by tactics that are tuned to the moment of maximum effectiveness
  • "He must prepare copy written in simple language and sixteen-word sentences" p167

He recommends each business make notes on all things public about the business, government legislation, even newspaper clippings to see how they are viewed by the public 
"House Organs" - in-house company magazines ... don't mention strikes or labor issues in general, despite being of utmost interest to the readership (employees) p210
[But this is my opinion, it just occurs immediately when reading this] A business producing a "house organ" that continually educates its employees on its business, its economics, its hiring practices, seems it would have no choice over time but to accumulate bias, until it's no longer trusted, and thus can no longer serve its purpose of educating employees (because they don't trust it to read it). A separate entity would have to publish it, yet paid for by the company, and no company would do that on its own, at least not without being required by law?

"The hidden market in the human personality" p216 (this is where his legacy begins, because psychology was new at the time)

"Advertising is re-education" p249

"People must want cleanliness before they want soap." p328

Friday, December 12, 2025

Anti Gravitational Belief Space


This is a picture of Belief Space, as measured by the study below. 

LLMs delve into online debates to create a detailed map of human beliefs
Jun 2025, phys.org

They used BERT on Debate.org and got the map seen above.

They found that "relative dissonance" significantly influences people's decision-making. When online users encounter new information or beliefs, they tend to choose or accept those that cause them less "discomfort" or are most aligned with their existing beliefs.

"More importantly, we show that people's belief choices are shaped not just by how close a belief is to their own, but by how much closer the belief is compared to its competing belief. When two opposing beliefs on a certain issue are equally distant, people are just as likely to choose either one. However, when one belief is clearly closer than the other, people are far more likely to choose it."

"In other words, people are not only avoiding disagreement, but actively minimizing the difference in disagreement between available options."

They would also like to connect their observations with the results of another project carried out at Indiana University, called BRAIN (Belief Resonance and AI Narratives).

via Indiana University: Byunghwee Lee et al, A semantic embedding space based on large language models for modelling human beliefs, Nature Human Behaviour (2025). DOI: 10.1038/s41562-025-02228-z


Perseus: A tool for tracking the coordination of pump-and-dump crypto coin schemes
Mar 2025, phys.org

Researchers suggest that there are fewer than 500 major players, who they describe as masterminds, working to game the system for profit. These masterminds, the researchers contend, have developed what have come to be known as pump-and-dump schemes, in which they hype a coin to get people to buy and then sell their own coins when they believe the buying has reached a saturation point, walking away with a substantial profit. (They use Telegram as their platform, and "accomplices" as their hypemen.) They found 438 masterminds, who are together responsible for about $3.2 trillion in artificial crypto coin trading.

But the way they say the last part is so cold:

In reading some of the messages sent between users on Telegram, the researchers noted that the ease with which the masterminds were able to carry out their schemes should be of concern to those attempting to make money off crypto coin investing. They also suggest that at some point, some form of regulation is going to be needed to keep the system running, because eventually, those being scammed will catch on and the whole system will collapse.

via University College London: Honglin Fu et al, Perseus: Tracing the Masterminds Behind Cryptocurrency Pump-and-Dump Schemes, arXiv (2025). DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2503.01686


Overconfident conspiracy theorists: Many unaware their beliefs are on the fringe
Jun 2025, phys.org

Man that sounds harsh

"This group of people are really miscalibrated from reality"

via Cornell University: Gordon Pennycook et al, Overconfidently Conspiratorial: Conspiracy Believers are Dispositionally Overconfident and Massively Overestimate How Much Others Agree With Them, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin (2025). DOI: 10.1177/01461672251338358


Octopus maps encourage conspiratorial thinking, research shows
Jun 2025, phys.org

"It's this genre of propaganda map where you try to make your opponent look like they're this big, sinister force that's everywhere and that's trying to control everything. It's up to you what that big sinister force is, but it's usually another country, another ideology, sometimes a religion, sometimes like a company or corporation, sometimes an individual person."

via Northeastern University: Eduardo Puerta et al, The Many Tendrils of the Octopus Map, Proceedings of the 2025 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (2025). DOI: 10.1145/3706598.3713583

This is another graph taken from the first article in this post, and it shows the polarization of beliefs about God and Abortion. For other less controversial topics, like prostitute or global warming, you can see the two clusters get closer together. 

Study finds Republicans flagged for posting misleading tweets twice as often as Democrats on Community Notes
Jun 2025, phys.org

Not like you didn't know this already but here's a handy metric - it's 2:1

"Even on Elon Musk's X, the user-based Community Notes program flags posts by Republicans as misleading much more often than posts by Democrats. This undercuts the logic offered by Musk and Mark Zuckerberg for eliminating fact-checkers on X and Meta, respectively, namely that fact-checkers are biased against Republicans."

Republican users were overrepresented in misinformation sharing on health, with 81% of health-related flagged posts written by Republicans, followed by politics, 73%; science, 68%; other topics, 66%; and the economy, at 63%.

(The researchers analyzed a dataset of X's Community Notes focusing specifically on "misinformed or potentially misleading" notes written in English targeting English-language tweets on X sent between January 2023 and June 2024.)

via Oxford Internet Institute: Thomas Renault et al, Republicans are flagged more often than Democrats for sharing misinformation on X's Community Notes, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (2025). DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2502053122


Body illusion helps unlock memories, new study finds
Oct 2025, phys.org

Enfacement illusion - allows people to experience a face they see on a computer screen as their own, as though looking in a mirror.

The participants viewed a live video of their own face, digitally altered using an image filter to resemble how they might have looked as children. After the illusion, participants completed an autobiographical memory interview, recalling events from both their childhood and the past year. Participants who viewed the childlike version of their face recalled significantly more episodic childhood memories.

"Our findings suggest that the bodily self and autobiographical memory are linked, as temporary changes to bodily experience can facilitate access to remote autobiographical memories."

via Anglia Ruskin University in Cambridge: Illusory ownership of one's younger face facilitates access to childhood episodic autobiographical memories, Scientific Reports (2025). DOI: 10.1038/s41598-025-17963-6


Over-the-counter painkillers match or surpass opioids for dental surgery in all adults, analysis confirms
Nov 2025, phys.org

As we can see not all facts are equal when there's money on the table - the opium machine was too powerful for too long and distorted the actual science.

And this isn't even news, it's a follow-up:

That first paper, on the collective experience of more than 1,800 trial patients, found that the combination of ibuprofen and acetaminophen provided better pain relief than hydrocodone with acetaminophen for the first two days after surgery and greater satisfaction over the post-operative period.

The new subgroup analysis, published in JAMA Network Open, demonstrated that the results held for both male and female patients.

"We wanted to determine whether the pain medication's effects were consistent in males and females separately," said Janine Fredericks Younger, an associate professor at Rutgers School of Dental Medicine and lead author of the analysis.

"And what we found is that in both subgroups (males and females), the non-opioid was superior for that first day and night, and then no worse than the opioid for the rest of the post-op period."

via Rutgers School of Dental Medicine: Analgesic Differences in Males and Females After Third Molar Surgery A Subgroup Analysis of the OARS Randomized Clinical Trial, JAMA Network Open (2025). DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.42467

Tuesday, December 9, 2025

Thanks Craigslist


In a fit of irony, I had never heard of this, and nobody I told this to had ever heard it either. This article is about polarization, but it's also about the decline of the news industry, the same industry that didn't do such a good job spreading this particular story over the past several years.


How the rise of Craigslist helped fuel America's political polarization
Aug 2025, phys.org

Craigslist launched in San Francisco in 1995, and over time effectively killed off the humble newspaper classified ad, which in the year 2000, made 30% of their revenues.

Craigslist rolled out in an idiosyncratic city-by-city expansion. This staggered spread created what is known in economics as a natural experiment.

This needs some explanation, so I'm copying most of it:

Looking at more than 1,500 newspapers, the researchers could compare what happened before and after Craigslist arrived, isolating its effects from other factors like the rapid expansion of broadband internet.

Newspaper executives axed a lot of the expensive, "prestige" political coverage that classifieds had subsidized, because it wasn't something readers flocked to, and it cost more to produce than sports or entertainment.

Following the entry of Craigslist in a market, newspapers reduced mentions of politicians competing in local congressional races by an average of 12%. The missing coverage also led to declines in circulation, particularly among readers interested in general news, who tended to be more educated, wealthier, and more politically engaged.

"When they're less informed and they're less likely to get solid information, they tend to go to extremes, because they don't have the information that the extreme candidates are extreme."

Readers who didn't follow politics closely were also affected. "You may not have been reading the newspaper because you wanted to learn about politics, but the stories about politics were bundled together with the things that you did care about."

When local political coverage disappeared, along with it went an important way for many voters to spot the differences between candidates, particularly unknown candidates running in party primaries. In a world of perfect information, extreme candidates would usually lose, because their stances are by definition far from the average voter's. When voters have less information available to ferret out political positions that do not align with their views, they cast more votes for extreme candidates.

"The reduction in staff covering politics made it harder for voters to differentiate between moderates and extremists in partisan primaries, and allowed extreme candidates to do better than they did before." This, in turn, fueled political polarization.

[And I guess this is why the City University of New York announced in 2024 a $10 million gift from Craig Newmark for a tuition-free Graduate School of Journalism.]

via Stanford University Graduate School of Business, Cornell and Ruben National University of Singapore: Milena Djourelova et al, The Impact of Online Competition on Local Newspapers: Evidence from the Introduction of Craigslist, Review of Economic Studies (2024). DOI: 10.1093/restud/rdae049

Image credit: AI Art - A Crowd From View - 2025

Post Script
I'll record here only for personal posterity's sake, a line of reasoning that follows from this - does this mean that advertising (in the form of classifieds) is necessary for democracy? I know Ben Franklin's newspaper in Philadelphia was funded by advertisers. Is it supposed to be government-funded? Sounds like someone needs to take a political science course. 

Post Post Script
This makes the social media problem circa the 2020's even more sinister, since these platforms, some of which are also the largest companies in the world, they're not only taking the advertising dollars from traditional media, but they're also incentivizing the opposite of information (in the form of dis- and mis-information). I mean they don't even employ journalists, nevermind the fact that they propagate on their networks non-news (as in, fake news from fake news outlets created with names to sound similar to reputable news outlets). 

Monday, November 24, 2025

Believe Me It Works


Placebo is magic. It's what makes 4 pills stronger than 2 pills of the same overall dose. It's what makes an injection stronger than a pill of the same thing. It's what makes "trust me I'm a doctor" work better than "sorry this is my first time doing this". It sure seems like something that has no business being in the field of medicine, or in scientific journals, or your local hospital, but it is, and because it has to be, because it's real. I mean, it's fake, but it's real, because it works. And that's because we, as humans, are weird as hell. And being susceptible to false beliefs is actually a survival trait. (But is there such thing as a false belief?)


How the placebo effect tricks the mind into relieving pain
May 2025, phys.org

The team found that the placebo effect occurred as a result of brain signals related to the endogenous opioid system in the medial prefrontal cortex, a region at the front of the brain, which in the presence of the placebo injections set off the descending pain inhibitory system.

via RIKEN: Hiroyuki Neyama et al, Opioidergic activation of the descending pain inhibitory system underlies placebo analgesia, Science Advances (2025). DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.adp8494



Gluten sensitivity linked to gut–brain interaction, not gluten itself, study finds
Oct 2025, phys.org

I'll take "other ways to say it's all in your head" for 100

  • This is about non-celiac gluten sensitivity or NCGS.
  • "Gluten sensitivity is not actually about gluten but part of the way the gut and brain interact."
  • "Contrary to popular belief, most people with NCGS aren't reacting to gluten." 
  • "Our findings show that symptoms are more often triggered by fermentable carbohydrates, commonly known as FODMAPs, by other wheat components or by people's expectations and prior experiences with food."
  • "Across recent studies, people with IBS who believe they're gluten-sensitive react similarly to gluten, wheat, and placebo. This suggests that how people anticipate and interpret gut sensations can strongly influence their symptoms." 

Later on:
Overall, people's responses were no different from when they were given a placebo.

Seriously how many other words do we need to use to hide the fact that they're saying no, there's no evidence of this happening?

via University of Melbourne: Jessica R Biesiekierski et al, Non-coeliac gluten sensitivity, The Lancet (2025). DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(25)01533-8


Meditation retreat rapidly reprograms body and mind, brain monitoring reveals
Nov 2025, phys.org

Open Label Placebo - participants knowingly take part in healing activities presented as placebos with no active medical ingredient, but which can still produce real benefits through the power of expectation, social connection and shared practices.

20 healthy adults attended a 7-day residential program featuring daily lecture sessions, approximately 33 hours of guided meditation and group healing practices. Before and after the retreat, participants had their brains scanned using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), and had blood testing. 

The researchers observed several major changes after the retreat:
  • Brain network changes: Meditation during the retreat reduced activity in parts of the brain associated with mental chatter, making brain function more efficient overall.
  • Enhanced neuroplasticity: When applied to laboratory-grown neurons, blood plasma from post-retreat participants made brain cells grow longer branches and form new connections.
  • Metabolic shifts: Cells treated with post-retreat plasma showed an increase in glycolytic (sugar-burning) metabolism, indicating a more flexible and adaptive metabolic state.
  • Natural pain relief: Blood levels of endogenous opioids—the body's natural painkillers—increased after the retreat, indicating that the body's natural pain-relief systems were activated.
  • Immune activation: Meditation increased inflammatory and anti-inflammatory immune signals simultaneously, suggesting a complex, adaptive immune response rather than a simple suppression or activation.
  • Gene and molecular signaling changes: Small RNA and gene activity in blood shifted after the retreat, particularly in pathways related to brain function.
  • Limitations - this was done with all healthy participants

via University of California San Diego: Alex Jinich-Diamant et al, Neural and molecular changes during a mind-body reconceptualization, meditation, and open label placebo healing intervention, Communications Biology (2025). DOI: 10.1038/s42003-025-09088-3

Post Script - Nocebo is the evil twin of Placebo, and it happens when you think a medication or treatment will make you worse, and they use instead of the medication a placebo, and it still makes your condition worse.

Etymology - early 13c., name given to the rite of Vespers of the Office of the Dead, so called from the opening of the first antiphon, "I will please the Lord in the land of the living" (Psalm cxvi.9, in Vulgate Placebo Domino in regione vivorum), from Latin placebo "I shall please," future indicative of placere "to please" ... Medical sense is recorded by 1785, "a medicine given more to please than to benefit the patient." Placebo effect is attested from 1900. (etymonline.com)


Monday, March 24, 2025

Facts, Fakes, Fake Facts and Psychological Operators

 

Brainwashing an entire population is hard work!

News consumers are more influenced by political alignment than by truth, study shows
Nov 2024, phys.org

The study is based on research conducted in 2020 with a sample of the voting-age U.S. population matched to the demographics of the census, and made up news headlines whereas earlier studies relied on existing ones. They also used a cover story about memory and communication, and even included foil questions, so that participants would not be aware of the nature of the study.

Both supporters and opponents believed those that aligned with their views more than they believed true headlines that did not align with their views.

"We found that the strongest predictors of bias include extreme views of Trump, a one-sided media diet, and belief in the objectivity and lack of bias of a person's own political side relative to the other side." 

In one measure of bias, the researchers assessed people's beliefs about their political side's objectivity as compared to the other side. Ironically, those most confident in their political side's lack of bias were the most biased.

In addition, the effect of partisan bias was stronger for real news than fake news. That is, people were more likely to disbelieve true information that challenged their political worldview than to accept false information that confirmed their worldview.

"We saw it on both political sides and even among people who scored well on a reasoning test. We were a bit surprised to see how widespread this tendency was. People were engaging in a lot of resistance to inconvenient truths."

"Everyone thinks it's the other person who is the problem."

But this very important point can't be overlooked, dropped halfway through the press article:

One contributing factor for this state of affairs, the researchers suggest, is increased consumption of partisan media.

And just for good measure, let's recall that as of 2010 Citizen's United allows private industry to contribute campaign funds to those running for public office. (As in, who's paying for that partisan media? Yes, that's who.) 

via: Department of Psychology in the School of Humanities and Sciences at Stanford: Michael C. Schwalbe et al, When politics trumps truth: Political concordance versus veracity as a determinant of believing, sharing, and recalling the news., Journal of Experimental Psychology: General (2024). DOI: 10.1037/xge0001650



Brief scientific literacy interventions may quash new conspiracy theories
Dec 2024, phys.org

Americans in states with higher scientific literacy scores were less likely to believe in conspiracies and had higher COVID-19 vaccination uptake rates over the time period.

via Penn State's Smeal College of Business: Nathan Allred et al, Conspiracy Beliefs and Consumption: The Role of Scientific Literacy, Journal of Consumer Research (2024). DOI: 10.1093/jcr/ucae024


A tangled web: Social media analysis suggests coordinated messaging among fossil fuel-derived hydrocarbon industries
Jan 2025, phys.org

Power rises to the top: "Our study suggests that climate obstruction in different industries is more coordinated than is generally recognized...these different companies in different sectors are using the same strategic messaging to promote a distorted image of their environmental responsibility."

Details: 125,300 unique tweets posted from 2008–2023 by the main Twitter accounts of nine key players in the US fossil energy/plastics/agrichemical trade: ExxonMobil, Chevron, American Petroleum Institute, Dow, Dupont de Nemours, Inc, American Chemistry Council, Corteva Agriscience, FMC Corp, American Farm Bureau

via Northeastern University: PLOS Climate (2025). DOI: 10.1371/journal.pclm.0000370


New AI tool detects fake news with 99% accuracy
Jan 2025, phys.org

The method developed by the researchers uses an "ensemble voting" technique, which combines the predictions of multiple different machine learning models to give an overall score.

(Too bad we don't actually care; see above.)

via Keele University School of Computer Science and Mathematics: Patricia Asowo et al, An Ensemble Modelling of Feature Engineering and Predictions for Enhanced Fake News Detection, Artificial Intelligence XLI (2024). DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-77918-3_16


Meta-analysis uncovers public's skill in detecting fake news, but skepticism towards true news persists
Mar 2025, phys.org

While their findings suggest that most people can accurately judge the veracity of news, they also showed that people are slightly better at spotting false news than true news. In other words, most of the people who took part in the studies appeared to be better skilled at rating false news as false than rating true news as true.

"A small majority of people show this trend (59%). The implication of this finding is that we should focus more on increasing the acceptance of true news. Currently, a lot of efforts are dedicated to making people skeptical of (false) news, however, our data shows that there may be more room to increase the acceptance of true news than to reduce the acceptance of false news."

I also remember the study about how mainstream news being skeptical of a science fact are more influential than a fake news site spreading obvious fake shit, for example BBC saying there may be a small risk of myocarditis for example, even if they have a million other articles that say vaccines are safe. There is a risk of myocarditis, but the risk of dying, or becoming disabled, from Covid due to lack of vaccination is far, far higher. See here or here.

via Jan Pfänder et al, Spotting false news and doubting true news: a systematic review and meta-analysis of news judgements, Nature Human Behaviour (2025). DOI: 10.1038/s41562-024-02086-1.

Friday, January 31, 2025

Techno Supreme aka The Man Behind the Curtain Is Not a Computer


Big Fossil doesn't want it to be true:
Research shows that auto plants grew their workforces after transitioning to electric vehicle production
Sep 2024, phys.org

Researchers at the University of Michigan have shown that plants in the ramp-up stages of transitioning to full-scale EV production saw assembly jobs increase as much as 10 times. At one plant studied, now with over a decade of EV production, the number of workers needed to make each vehicle has remained three times higher.

"There is a shortage of information out there about how the transition is shaping up. What we're seeing, with the data that's available, is that the loss of employment predicted for EVs is not happening."

via University of Michigan: Andrew Weng et al, Higher labor intensity in US automotive assembly plants after transitioning to electric vehicles, Nature Communications (2024). DOI: 10.1038/s41467-024-52435-x



McDonald’s touchscreen kiosks were feared as job killers
Sep 2024, CNN Business

“In theory, kiosks should help save on labor, but in reality, restaurants have added complexity due to mobile ordering and delivery, and the labor saved from kiosks is often reallocated for these efforts. Kiosks “have created a restaurant within a restaurant.”

And in some cases, kiosks have even been a flop. Bowling ally chain Bowlero added kiosks in lanes for customers to order food and drinks, but they went unused because staff and customers weren’t fully trained on using them.

A recent study from Temple University researchers found that, when a line forms behind customers using kiosks, they experience more stress when placing their orders and purchase less food. And some customers take longer to order tapping around on kiosks and paying than they do telling a cashier they’d like to order a burger and fries.

Sociologist at Drew University Christopher Andrews - “The introduction of ATMs did not result in massive technological unemployment for bank tellers,” he said. “Instead, it freed them up from low-value tasks such as depositing and cashing checks to perform other tasks* that created value.”
*Note, as experienced by certain Wells Fargo employees circa 2015, these "other tasks" included using customer account data to upsell investment instruments: Wells Fargo to Pay $500 Million for Misleading Investors About the Success of Its Largest Business Unit (between 2012 and 2016), reported 2020

Monday, January 13, 2025

Science Doesn't Work For Free


This post is about how science works, and how it doesn't. 

Science is hard work, and requires lots of money, most of which comes from public funds and school tuitions. But some of it comes from people-like entities called corporations. Sometimes it's hard to tell what money goes where and from who, and we want to know because those who fund science are ultimately creating our reality.

Infiltrating academia is the most surreptitious, subversive, insidious (and let's face it - effective) way to control the minds of a population, every big industry (Big Agra, Big Rubber, Big Cheese, Big PFAS?) will spend more money manipulating reality by way of academic scientific pursuits than making their own products and services. 

This first article is from the Barabasi labs and uses network science, so the way they do their study is interesting:

Study reveals complex dynamics of philanthropic funding for US science
Jun 2024, phys.org

The IRS in recent years has made the tax form that nonprofits must file disclosing their revenue, expenditures, and other organizational information machine readable. Researchers then analyzed more than 3.6 million tax records filed by approximately 685,000 universities and research institutions between 2010 and 2019. 

"Some philanthropists make it very explicit that they give to their local communities. The Gates Foundation's biggest donation was to the University of Washington; they favor things in Seattle much more than they declared."

The authors also found that the amount of philanthropic dollars institutions receive is highly correlated to the degree of support provided by the National Science Foundation.

Additionally, private donors and nonprofits tend to support the same organizations over time, the analysis showed. with an 80% chance that a donor who gave to an organization two years in a row would support it the following year; for funding relationships that had lasted seven years, the probability is 90%.

Such a tool could enhance the public's understanding of the impact of philanthropy on science and help researchers gain access and awareness of the philanthropic options that could advance their work.

via Virginia University and Albert-László Barabási at Northeastern University: Louis M. Shekhtman et al, Mapping philanthropic support of science, Scientific Reports (2024). DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-58367-2



Next - Science depends on a written record of experiments and results. Maintaining the record of science, i.e., scientific journals, is done almost exclusively by the private industry. Sometimes, both the scientsits and the publishers have an incentive to NOT realize they're doing something wrong (Upton Sinclair: "It is difficult to get a man to understand something when his salary depends on his not understanding it").

Here's a story about how bad science happens, and what it can do to the rest of us. This is about retractions:

University of Minnesota retracts pioneering studies in stem cells, Alzheimer's disease
Jun 2024, phys.org

Dr. Karen Ashe and colleagues gained global attention in 2006 when they found amyloid beta star 56 as a molecular target in the onset of Alzheimer's disease.

Colleagues at other institutions struggled to replicate their findings, which prompted others to look closer at the images of cellular or molecular activity in mice on which their findings were based.

Verfaillie and colleagues corrected the Nature paper in 2007, which contained an image of cellular activity in mice that appeared identical to an image in a different paper that supposedly came from different mice. The U then launched an investigation over complaints of image duplications or manipulations in more of Verfaillie's papers.

It eventually cleared her of misconduct, but blamed her for inadequate training and oversight and claimed that a junior researcher had falsified data in a similar study published in the journal Blood.

The journal Nature stated that the paper contained "excessive manipulation, including splicing, duplication and the use of an eraser tool" to edit the images.

(This is almost 20 years later, and after lots of people invested lots of money in chasing this result.)

via The Star Tribune:
Sylvain Lesné et al, RETRACTED ARTICLE: A specific amyloid-β protein assembly in the brain impairs memory, Nature (2006). DOI: 10.1038/nature04533
Yuehua Jiang et al, RETRACTED ARTICLE: Pluripotency of mesenchymal stem cells derived from adult marrow, Nature (2002). DOI: 10.1038/nature00870

Less sensational, or perhaps more sensational, is this absolute bomb - dropped on all of us who've been obediently following the one-drink-a-day advice for about one generation since it first came out.

The worldwide public health community has been scratching its head over this since it emerged from the data, many years ago. People who drink once a day seem to live longer than people who drink none. Therefore, one drink a day must be good for you! Hmmm. Turns out the only people in a large population who we can get to serve as a "normal healthy person who doesn't ever drink" is a person who's suffering from former substance abuse, and abstaining from alcohol not for any other reason than the fact that it's going to ruin their life. And those people have a built-in health burden that makes them a bad reference point for a "normal healthy person", and then makes all the rest of us look less healthy when compared to them.  It's called the Former Drinker Paradox, or a number of other names, and it's likely going to be the canonical case study in public health research courses for decades to come. 

This is a story about the scientific method, study design, and the need to understand how large numbers work when mashed together:

Study debunks link between moderate drinking and longer life
Jul 2024, phys.org

Reminder - "lower quality" studies, with older participants, no distinction between former drinkers and lifelong abstainers, linked moderate drinking to greater longevity. So moderate drinkers were compared with "abstainer" and "occasional drinker" groups that included some older adults who had quit or cut down on drinking because they'd developed any number of health conditions. "That makes people who continue to drink look much healthier by comparison."

"If you look at the weakest studies," Stockwell said, "that's where you see health benefits."

Yes, the weak studies. 

Further reading: Stockwell, T., et al. Why do only some cohort studies find health benefits from low volume alcohol use? A systematic review and meta-analysis of study characteristics that may bias mortality risk estimates. Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs (2024). DOI: 10.15288/jsad.23-00283. 

Next - The scientists who make the content in the journals and the people who run the publishing industry are not the same people, yet they both seem to be having a hard time resisting the temptation to use robots:

Flood of 'junk': How AI is changing scientific publishing
Aug 2024, phys.org

A bioinformatics professor at Brigham Young University in the United States told AFP that he had been asked to peer review the study in March.

After realizing it was "100 percent plagiarism" of his own study - but with the text seemingly rephrased by an AI program - he rejected the paper.

He said he was "shocked" to find the plagiarized work had simply been published elsewhere, in a new Wiley journal called Proteomics.

More than 13,000 papers were retracted last year, by far the most in history, according to the US-based group Retraction Watch. The paper in question in this writeup, however, has not yet been retracted.
Note: usually I try to add the academic paper here at the bottom, and which is usually taken from the bottom of the writeup, but in this case I think there is no paper, and the bottom of the writeup points to ... the journal that reprinted the obviously fake paper. Proteomics. Remember the name. But also remember that the science aggregator website (phys.org) probably uses some level of automation (remember when we used to call AI simply "automation"?) to place the article information at the bottom of the writeup, explaining how this happened here. This is the future. 

Paper mills: The 'cartel-like' companies behind fraudulent scientific journals
Oct 2024, phys.org via Rizqy Amelia Zein for The Conversation

In just five years, the numbers of retractions jumped from 10 in 2019 to 2,099 in 2023. [link]

Paper Mills - By paying around €180 to €5,000 (approximately US$197–$5,472), a person can have their name listed as the author of research paper, without having to painstakingly do research and write the results.

And this is how:
  • plagiarize other published articles
  • contain false and stolen data
  • include engineered and duplicated images
  • rewrite scientific articles using generative artificial intelligence 
  • translate published articles from other languages into English
  • sell authorship slots before an article is accepted, guaranteed to publish
  • offer fake peer review services to convince potential buyers
  • bribing rogue journal editors with as  much as $20,000 [link]
  • unusual collaboration patterns: An article on the activity of ground beetles attacking crops in Kazakhstan, for example, is written by authors who are neither affiliated with institutions in Kazakhstan nor experts in insects or agriculture. The authors' backgrounds are suspiciously heterogeneous, ranging from anesthesia, dentistry, to biomedical engineering. 
Journals rarely state outright that a retraction is due to paper mill fraud, so Retraction Watch data as of May 2024 only recorded 7,275 retractions of articles related to the paper mill out of a total of 44,000 retractions recorded. In fact, it is estimated that up to 400,000 paper mill articles have infiltrated scientific literature over the past two decades.

via The Conversation under Creative Commons license


Even the survey participants themselves can't resist!

Survey participants are turning to AI, putting academic research results into question
Nov 2024, phys.org

"AI use has probably caused scholars and researchers and editors to pay increased scrutiny to the quality of their data."

The authors surveyed about 800 participants on Prolific (like Mechanical Turk) to learn how they engage with LLMs. All had taken surveys on Prolific at least once; 40% had taken seven surveys or more in the last 24 hours. 

The authors also noted that these responses included more "dehumanizing" language when describing Black Americans, Democrats, and Republicans. In contrast, LLMs consistently used more neutral, abstract language, suggesting that they may approach race, politics, and other sensitive topics with more detachment.

Participants who were newer to Prolific or identified as male, Black, Republican, or college-educated, were more likely to say they'd used AI writing assistance.

Societal inflection point: To see how human-crafted answers differ from AI-generated ones, the authors looked at data from three studies fielded on gold-standard samples before the public release of ChatGPT in November 2022. 

via Stanford Graduate School of Business, New York University and Cornell: Simone Zhang et al, Generative AI Meets Open-Ended Survey Responses: Participant Use of AI and Homogenization, SocArXiv (2024). DOI: 10.31235/osf.io/4esdp


Bonus Reminder:
Ensuring Free, Immediate, and Equitable Access to Federally Funded Research
This memorandum provides policy guidance to federal agencies with research and development
expenditures on updating their public access policies. In accordance with this memorandum,
OSTP recommends that federal agencies, to the extent consistent with applicable law:
  1. Update their public access policies as soon as possible, and no later than December 31st, 2025, to make publications and their supporting data resulting from federally funded research publicly accessible without an embargo on their free and public release;
  2. Establish transparent procedures that ensure scientific and research integrity is maintained in public access policies; and,
  3. Coordinate with OSTP to ensure equitable delivery of federally funded research results and data. Aug 25 2022.

Tuesday, January 7, 2025

Algorithmic Intent


Whether this is collusion or not it provides the same support for the fact that - we cannot actually study these things because we have no idea what they're doing on the back end (looking at you Chat)

Team debunks research showing Facebook's news-feed algorithm curbs election misinformation
Sep 2024, phys.org

The team's work shows that the research was conducted during a short period when Meta temporarily introduced a new, more rigorous news algorithm rather than its standard one, and that the previous researchers did not account for the algorithmic change. This helped to create the misperception, widely reported by the media, that Facebook and Instagram's news feeds are largely reliable sources of trustworthy news.

Also note - "social media are not required to make any public notification of significant changes to their algorithms" (not in the United States, that is)

via Manning College of Information and Computer Science at University of Massachusetts Amherst: H. Holden Thorp, Context matters in social media, Science (2024). DOI: 10.1126/science.adt2983.


Post Script:
Researchers identify 'dancer' as a new curiosity style in Wikipedia browsing
Oct 2024, phys.org

I just thought this was an interesting point:

"Wikipedia is a very special place on the internet. The site features exclusively free content and no commercial advertisements. Much of the rest of the contemporary digital landscape is designed to activate individuals' buying impulses and customizes our media content. This raises the question of how much we are in charge of where our curiosity takes us in online contexts beyond Wikipedia."
-David Lydon-Staley, assistant professor in the Annenberg School for Communication at U Penn

via University of Pennsylvania Complex Systems Lab: Dale Zhou et al, Architectural styles of curiosity in global Wikipedia mobile app readership, Science Advances (2024). DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.adn3268


Post Post Script, same thing:
Our outrage over social media posts helps misinformation spread, study shows
Nov 2024, phys.org

The formula we all knew was there the whole time:

"Since outrage is associated with increased engagement online, outrage-evoking misinformation may be likely to spread farther in part because of the algorithmic amplification of engaging content."

via Department of Psychology and School of Public and International Affairs at Princeton, and Northwestern's Kellogg School of Management: Killian L. McLoughlin et al, Misinformation exploits outrage to spread online, Science (2024). DOI: 10.1126/science.adl2829

Friday, December 20, 2024

Inside the World of the LSD User


The spread of misinformation varies by topic and by country in Europe, study finds
May 2024, phys.org

Researchers analyzed news activity on Twitter (now X) in France, Germany, Italy and the UK from 2019 to 2021, including a focus on news about Brexit, the coronavirus, and the COVID vaccines. Each news source they analyzed was rated as either "reliable" or "questionable" based upon their NewsGuard score.
  • Across all four countries, the vast majority of users only ever consumed reliable news sources on each of the three topics.
  • But in every country and in each topic, there was always a small percentage of users who only ever consumed questionable news sources - with very few people consuming a mix of both reliable and questionable sources.
  • Germany had the highest ratio of questionable news retweets to reliable news retweets on all three topics, with France in second, followed by Italy, and the UK had the lowest proportion of questionable news retweets overall.
  • Italy had the lowest proportion of questionable news retweets for the topic of the coronavirus - but had the highest percentage of people consuming only questionable news sources on Brexit.

"Cultural nuances" will be important when it comes to fighting misinformation.

via Ca' Foscari University of Venice: News and misinformation consumption: A temporal comparison across European countries, PLoS ONE (2024). DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0302473

Image credit: 3D printed vacuum system traps dark matter - University of Nottingham - Jun 2024


Study finds avoiding social media before an election has little to no effect on people's political views
May 2024, phys.org

35,000 Facebook and Instagram users who were paid to stay off the platforms in the run-up to Election Day.

I'm thinking about the overall social influence, like if you're not online but your friends are, it's all the same. So if they did this study by taking only the friends of the people chosen, then we would see an effect? (Friendship Paradox)

via Stanford: Gentzkow, Matthew, The effects of Facebook and Instagram on the 2020 election: A deactivation experiment, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (2024). DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2321584121.


Mental disorders may spread in young people's social networks
May 2024, phys.org

Contagion - 700,000 ninth-grade pupils born between 1985 and 1997 from 860 Finnish schools followed for 11 years (largest and most comprehensive so far on the spread of mental disorders in social networks).

The number of classmates diagnosed with a mental disorder was associated with a higher risk of receiving a mental disorder diagnosis later in life.

The connection observed in the study is not necessarily causal. "It may be possible, for instance, that the threshold for seeking help for mental health issues is lowered when there are one or more people in your social network who have already sought help for their problems" (beneficial contagion).

via University of Helsinki: Jussi Alho et al, Transmission of Mental Disorders in Adolescent Peer Networks, JAMA Psychiatry (2024). DOI: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2024.1126

Dual-species Rydberg array combining rubidium and cesium atoms to enhance quantum computing - BernienLab at University of Chicago - Oct 2024 [link]

Study suggests less conformity leads to more innovation
May 2024, phys.org

These methods reveal something crazy - how easy it could be to manipulate a big part of a population just by doing some very small adjustments to the recommendation algorithms, and the idea of synthetic networks cycling through the real networks as a kind of social regulator.

  • The Matthew effect aka "rich-get-richer effect" increases centralization in the network, which destroys the niches protecting minority opinions, reducing sociodiversity.
  • "Networks that promote sociodiversity have structural features that protect minority opinions"
  • "Unfollowing a few VIPs can help to promote sociodiversity"

via Complexity Science Hub and ETH Zurich: Andrea Musso et al, How networks shape diversity for better or worse, Royal Society Open Science (2024). DOI: 10.1098/rsos.230505


Misleading COVID-19 headlines from mainstream sources did more harm on Facebook than fake news
May 2024, phys.org

They showed thousands of survey participants the headlines from 130 vaccine-related stories - including both mainstream content and known misinformation - and tested how those headlines impacted their intentions to get vaccinated against COVID-19. Researchers also asked a separate group of respondents to rate the headlines across various attributes, including plausibility and political leaning. They matched that against 13,206 vaccine-related URLs and the number of users who viewed each.
  • Misleading content from mainstream news sources - rather than outright misinformation or "fake news" - was the primary driver of vaccine hesitancy on Facebook.
  • "Vaccine-skeptical" content was potentially misleading but not flagged as misinformation by Facebook fact-checkers.
  • One factor reliably predicted impacts on vaccination intentions: the extent to which a headline suggested that the vaccine was harmful to a person's health.
  • The most-viewed was an article was from a well-regarded mainstream news source, and its clickbait" headline was highly suggestive and implied that the vaccine was likely responsible.
  • (That's significant since the vast majority of viewers on social media likely never click out to read past the headline.)
  • Contrary to popular perceptions, the researchers estimated that vaccine-skeptical content reduced vaccination intentions 46 times more than misinformation flagged by fact-checkers.
  • Even though flagged misinformation was more harmful when seen, it had relatively low reach.
  • Gray-area content is less harmful per exposure but is seen far more often, thus it's more impactful overall.
(Also, what does this mean about actual advertising metrics?)

via MIT Sloan School of Management: Jennifer Allen, Quantifying the impact of misinformation and vaccine-skeptical content on Facebook, Science (2024). DOI: 10.1126/science.adk3451.


Advertisers may be inadvertently funding misinformation
Jun 2024, phys.org

(I think we're starting to see a pattern here.)

5,000 websites (1,250 were misinformation websites); 42,000 unique advertisers; nine million instances of advertising companies appearing on news websites from 2019 to 2021. 

The companies advertising on misinformation websites accounted for anywhere from 46% to 82% of overall companies in their respective industries.

Companies that used digital advertisement platforms were 10 times more likely to appear on misinformation websites than those that did not.

Authors propose two low-cost, scalable interventions: 
  • Improve transparency for advertisers about where their ads appear 
  • Make it easier for consumers to identify which companies advertise on misinformation outlets through information disclosures and company rankings

via Carnegie Mellon University's Heinz College and Stanford: Wajeeha Ahmad et al, Companies inadvertently fund online misinformation despite consumer backlash, Nature (2024). DOI: 10.1038/s41586-024-07404-1

Entangling pairs of photons using 1.2 micrometer niobium oxide dichloride - Leevi Kallioniemi at Nanyang Technological University in Singapore - Oct 2024 [link]

Study suggests ambivalence and polarized views can promote political violence
Jun 2024, phys.org

Time to get confused! 

Previous research has shown that ambivalence about a political issue typically leads people to avoid taking moderate actions such as voting or donating money in support of that issue.

And that's why these findings for extreme behaviors surprised the researchers.

Here, researchers found that ambivalence can actually lead some people - especially those with polarized views - to be more supportive of extreme actions.

The reason? Ambivalence creates discomfort in those with extreme views by making them feel weak or insecure about their beliefs - and that can lead them to compensate.

"When people have these polarized views on a political topic, but also feel some conflict about that belief - that is really a potent combination."

"Those who are conflicted are more willing to give their money to extreme organizations."

"Those who have extreme views, but still feel conflicted about them, feel a need to prove themselves, to show that their beliefs are real and strong."

via Ohio State University: Joseph Siev, Ambivalent attitudes promote support for extreme political actions, Science Advances (2024). DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.adn2965.