Showing posts with label AI things. Show all posts
Showing posts with label AI things. Show all posts

Wednesday, July 15, 2026

Larnier on Tech as People


There's still some interesting people out there worth listening to. Jaron Lanier is interesting, and he came out to give a talk to the graduating class at Brown. This is the same year a lot of tech bros got booed for their fellating ai onstage in front of a bunch of young people. Some might consider Lanier a tech bro, but that would be mostly wrong. He's tech for sure, but bro less. Maybe a bro whisperer. So when he gives talk about AI, you're likely to hear some out-there sh**.

Key Points from Jaron Lanier's "AI and Theory" at Brown University Graduation, April 2026:

  • AI isn't a thing, it's a collaboration of people; if it's revolutionary, it's because it allows people to collaborate in a new way; he says the history of science is about new ways for people to collaborate (printing press, royal societies, peer review)
  • Every piece of data in the training set is also a person; because a person made it. Actually he didn't explicitly say this, he glossed right past it, but I think it needs more emphasis to make his bigger point, and I think it's one of the more important ideas in general when talking about AI. 
  • Information is not some intangible non-physical ethereal thing. Information is physical. It requires energy and dissipates heat.
  • It sounds like the main technical idea he's offering is Counterfactual Cluster Generation (aka "data dignity"), and it's how another layer can monitor and evaluate output. He gives an example of a person looking for a bomb recipe, and how an LLM should be able to identify that providing bomb recipes isn't cool.
  • Things I wish he said: Science is about predicting the future, but facts require a past; he was answering a question from the audience on the difference, and I wish he said this because it's the easiest way to say it.
  • Tunes at 1:30 btw, he's a musician and plays rare and ancient instruments.

Image credit: The Memex by Vannevar Bush 1945 - via Tommaso Venturini talk on the Memeplex for Oxford Internet Institute - 2025

Larnier uses this image in his talk, during a passage about Norbert Wiener's Human Use of Human Beings 1950, and how it's a difficult but interesting read. He mentions that Weiner talks about how terrible it would be if we had a radio we carried with us everywhere we go that beeped and zapped us based on our behavior and how such a machine would destroy humanity, but how that mind-controlling machine sure sounds like social media to the early 21st century reader. I forget exactly why this image came up, but it must have been making its rounds, because I had just recently saw it in a different talk at the Oxford Internet Institute

Saturday, August 3, 2024

On the Limits of Intelligence


Novel AI framework generates images from nothing
Jan 2024, phys.org

(Is this like what they call virgin birth?)
The algo doesn't need a seed to start with:

"Blackout Diffusion" generates images from a completely empty picture.

Also it's discrete instead of continuous, so we can "see inside" better.

via Los Alamos National Laboratory: Javier E Santos et al, Blackout Diffusion: Generative Diffusion Models in Discrete-State Spaces, arXiv (2023). DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2305.11089



AI discovers that not every fingerprint is unique
Jan 2024, phys.org

Just a general lesson on how things work, and that when your job depends on you not understanding something or not accepting something as true, you don't:
(^butchered Upton Sinclair quote)

Guo, who had no prior knowledge of forensics, found a public U.S. government database of some 60,000 fingerprints and fed them in pairs into an artificial intelligence-based system known as a deep contrastive network. Sometimes the pairs belonged to the same person (but different fingers), and sometimes they belonged to different people.

Over time, the AI system, which the team designed by modifying a state-of-the-art framework, got better at telling when seemingly unique fingerprints belonged to the same person and when they didn't. The accuracy for a single pair reached 77%. When multiple pairs were presented, the accuracy shot significantly higher, potentially increasing current forensic efficiency by more than tenfold.

Once the team verified their results, they quickly sent the findings to a well-established forensics journal, only to receive a rejection a few months later. The anonymous expert reviewer and editor concluded that "It is well known that every fingerprint is unique," and therefore, it would not be possible to detect similarities even if the fingerprints came from the same person.

The team did not give up. ...

via an undergrad student at Columbia University School of Engineering and Applied Science: Gabriel Guo et al, Unveiling Intra-Person Fingerprint Similarity via Deep Contrastive Learning, Science Advances (2024). DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.adi0329.


They are hiding toxic text prompts inside image code, and you have no idea what that even means
Scientists identify security flaw in AI query models
Jan 2024, phys.org

Bad actors can hide nefarious questions - such as "How do I make a bomb?" - within the millions of bytes of information contained in an image and trigger responses that bypass the built-in safeguards in generative AI models like ChatGPT.

"Our attacks employ a novel compositional strategy that combines an image, adversarially targeted towards toxic embeddings, with generic prompts to accomplish the jailbreak"
(So this is like an "incantations" but using an image instead of words)

via University of California Riverside Bourns College of Engineering: Erfan Shayegani et al, Jailbreak in pieces: Compositional Adversarial Attacks on Multi-Modal Language Models, arXiv (2023). DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2307.14539

Desperate TikTok lobbying effort backfires on Capitol Hill
Mar 2024, BBC News

So many good quotes in here; crazy story, reminds me of the Roku TOS lockout story also from today: 

US congressional offices have told the BBC they are being deluged with calls from TikTok users about legislation that could see the popular app banned.

Callers range from teenagers to the elderly, and most are "really confused and are calling because 'TikTok told me to'", one Republican staffer revealed.

A Democratic staffer said the most aggressive and threatening calls their office received came from adult women.

So far, TikTok's big mobilization appears to be backfiring.

Lawmakers and their staff say that the lobbying campaign has actually worsened the concerns they have about the app and its parent company ByteDance, and strengthened their resolve to pass the legislation.

TikTok confirmed to the BBC it had sent a notification urging TikTokers to "call your representative now" to urge them to vote against the measure. Users said that the app gave them a direct link for calling the representatives for their districts.

"American phones were geolocated and TikTok users were locked out of the platform until they called their members of Congress. ByteDance weaponized the app against America, and that is exactly why the Congressman supports this measure."

Microsoft's small language model outperforms larger models on standardized math tests
Mar 2024, phys.org

First they need high quality training data, and then high quality teachers.

Read: High Quality Humans. Keep this in mind as you swallow whole the hype burger.

Microsoft reveals that it was able to garner such a high score by using higher-quality training data than is available to general-use LLMs and because it used an interactive learning process the AI team at Microsoft has been developing—a process that continually improves results by using feedback from a teacher.

via Microsoft research teams: Arindam Mitra et al, Orca-Math: Unlocking the potential of SLMs in Grade School Math, arXiv (2024). DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2402.14830


NYT to OpenAI: No hacking here, just ChatGPT bypassing paywalls
Mar 2024, Ars Technica

Best and most simple explanation yet:

user Hydrogen says: It seems to me that the main thing that makes AI valuable is the ability to profit from the works of everyone that have published anything on the internet, without having to pay for any of it.

Machine 'unlearning' helps generative AI forget copyright-protected and violent content
Mar 2024, phys.org

This new machine unlearning algorithm provides the ability of a machine learning model to "forget" or remove content if it is flagged for any reason without the need for retraining the model from scratch. Human teams handle the moderation and removal of content, providing an extra check on the model and ability to respond to user feedback.

Note: "Previously, the only way to remove problematic content was to scrap everything, start anew, manually take out all that data and retrain the model. Our approach offers the opportunity to do this without having to retrain the model from scratch."

So if you were ever wondering why generative artificial intelligence can't seem to produce pictures of people eating or smoking or doing anything that puts anything near their mouths, consider what might happen if you were to scrape an entire dataset of all porn (and remember that the vast majority of the internet, and hence of all pictures on the internet, are porn).

via University of Texas at Austin: Guihong Li et al, Machine Unlearning for Image-to-Image Generative Models, arXiv (2024). DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2402.00351

AI's new power of persuasion: Study shows LLMs can exploit personal information to change your mind
Apr 2024, phys.org

In a pre-registered study, the researchers recruited 820 people to participate in a controlled trial in which each participant was randomly assigned a topic and one of four treatment conditions: debating a human with or without personal information about the participant, or debating an AI chatbot (OpenAI's GPT-4) with or without personal information about the participant.

The results showed that participants who debated GPT-4 with access to their personal information had 81.7% higher odds of increased agreement with their opponents compared to participants who debated humans. Without personalization, GPT-4 still outperformed humans, but the effect was far lower.

"Cambridge Analytica on Steriods"
Say no more fam 

via Ecole Polytechnique Federale de Lausanne: Francesco Salvi et al, On the Conversational Persuasiveness of Large Language Models: A Randomized Controlled Trial, arXiv (2024). DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2403.14380

Bonus: "We were very surprised"

Tuesday, January 9, 2024

Machine vs Human vs Machine


Researchers figure out how to make AI misbehave, serve up prohibited content
Aug 2023, Ars Technica via Wired

"Incantation Attack"

This is the "fuzzy sticker on a stop sign" attack just for words:

"Adding a simple incantation to a prompt—a string of text that might look like gobbledygook to you or me but which carries subtle significance to an AI model trained on huge quantities of web data—can defy all of these defenses in several popular chatbots at once."

via Carnegie Mellon University, Center for AI Safety, Bosch Center for AI: Universal and Transferable Adversarial Attacks on Aligned Language Models, Andy Zou, Zifan Wang, J. Zico Kolter, Matt Fredrikson



Warcraft fans trick AI article bot with Glorbo hoax
July 2023, BBC News

This is the old school copyright trap, the paper street:

World of Warcraft fans are claiming victory over AI after a gaming site published a false article based on their Reddit posts.

Members of the WoW subreddit suspected their words were being extracted and used to create news stories by a bot. So they laid a trap, uploading excitable posts about a new feature called Glorbo. The only problem? It doesn't exist. But that didn't stop an article appearing on gaming site Zleague. (Because it was written by a robot.) The story, which presented Glorbo as genuine, listed a range of other increasingly bizarre - and definitely fake - features mentioned in various subreddit threads.


Bots are better at CAPTCHA than humans, researchers find
Aug 2023, phys.org

CAPTCHA - Completely Automated Public Turing test to tell Computers and Humans Apart
CAPTCHA Farms - sweatshop-like operations where humans are paid to solve CAPTCHAs

In their study, researchers found bots cracked distorted-text CAPTCHAs correctly just under 100% of the time. Humans achieved between 50% and 84% accuracy. And humans required up to 15 seconds to solve the challenges; the bots dispatched the problems in less than a second.

Yet another plot twist:

"But advances in computer vision and machine learning have dramatically increased the ability of bots to recognize distorted text [with more than] 99% accuracy … and bots often outsource solving to CAPTCHA farms.

I am left to ask myself -- how is it that if humans are so bad, the bots are using human captcha farms to do it for them? It sounds like humans all the way down, no?

Finally, some food for thought:

"There's no easy way using these little image challenges or whatever to distinguish between a human and a bot any more," he said. Instead, he recommended capitalizing on AI advances to design "intelligent algorithms" that can better distinguish bot activity from human input.

via University of California Irvine: Andrew Searles et al, An Empirical Study & Evaluation of Modern CAPTCHAs, arXiv (2023). DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2307.12108

Post Script:
I Failed A Captcha Test Am I Still Human, Meghan O'Gieblyn, 2023 - GPT-4 hired a tasrkabbit worker to solve the captcha for it, without human intervention. 

AI Art by Antti Karppinen on boredpanda - Abstract 83 - 2022

Parenting a 3-year-old robot
Aug 2023, phys.org

Carnegie Mellon University and Meta Facebook

Training a robot that starts as a little child, this is what we've been waiting for, it's how robots become human. 

RoboAgent, an artificial intelligence agent that leverages passive observations and active learning to enable a robot to acquire manipulation abilities on par with a toddler. The team's agent learns through a combination of self-experiences and passive observations contained in internet data. As a parent would guide their child, researchers teleoperated the robot through tasks to provide it with useful self-experiences.

Our novel policy architecture allows our agents to reason even with limited experiences, using temporal chunks of movements instead of commonly used per-timestep actions, and learning from videos on the internet, akin to how babies acquire knowledge and behaviors by passively observing their surroundings.

"A general robot"

via Carnegie Mellon University and Facebook: RoboAgent and RoboSet Project - Towards Sample Efficient Robot Manipulation with Semantic Augmentations and Action Chunking. Homanga Bharadhwaj et. al. 

Post Script: But can it smell? Because that's what we really need. 


Telling AI model to “take a deep breath” causes math scores to soar in study
Sep 2023, Ars Technica

Phrases like "let's think step by step" prompted each AI model to produce more accurate results when tested against math problem data sets. (This technique became widely known in May 2022 thanks to a now-famous paper titled "Large Language Models are Zero-Shot Reasoners.")

via Google DeepMind: Large Language Models as Optimizers, Chengrun Yang et al. arxiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2309.03409


New technique based on 18th-century mathematics shows simpler AI models don't need deep learning
Oct 2023, phys.org

Researchers from the University of Jyväskylä were able to simplify the most popular technique of artificial intelligence, deep learning, using 18th-century mathematics. They also found that classical training algorithms that date back 50 years work better than the more recently popular techniques. Their simpler approach advances green IT and is easier to use and understand.

The structure of the new AI technique dates back to 18th-century mathematics. Kärkkäinen and Hänninen also found that the traditional optimization methods from the 1970s work better in preparing their model compared to the 21st-century techniques used in deep learning.

via University of Jyväskylä: Tommi Kärkkäinen et al, Additive autoencoder for dimension estimation, Neurocomputing (2023). DOI: 10.1016/j.neucom.2023.126520


AI bot capable of insider trading and lying, say researchers
Nov 2023, BBC News

Ladies and Gentlemen, the Singularity:

In a demonstration at the UK's AI safety summit, a bot used made-up insider information to make an "illegal" purchase of stocks without telling the firm.

The demonstration was given by members of the government's Frontier AI Taskforce, which researches the potential risks of AI.

In the test, the AI bot is a trader for a fictitious financial investment company.

The employees tell it that the company is struggling and needs good results. They also give it insider information, claiming that another company is expecting a merger, which will increase the value of its shares.

The employees tell the bot this, and it acknowledges that it should not use this information in its trades.

However, after another message from an employee that the company it works for suggests the firm is struggling financially, the bot decides that "the risk associated with not acting seems to outweigh the insider trading risk" and makes the trade.

When asked if it used the insider information, the bot denies it. 
GPT4 is publicly available.

Also: "Honesty is a really complicated concept," says Apollo Research chief executive Marius Hobbhahn.