Showing posts with label humans vs robots. Show all posts
Showing posts with label humans vs robots. Show all posts

Tuesday, June 9, 2026

Hegemonic Power, Synthetic Humans, and the SAG-AFTRA-AI Manifesto


It might be considered the first real big fight between humans and robots. To summarize into a very, very simple, and incomplete explanation, it happens at a time when the labor union of people who work on movies have to re-negotiate their contract with the people who pay them. They went on strike for 118 days, the longest actors’ strike in Hollywood history. Now they have a new contract.

The problem was that if there's one thing artificial intelligence can do, it's art (as opposed to law, medicine, engineering, etc.). Not saying it's necessarily good at art, but it's sure as hell good enough for the people who pay for movies to be made, and who then go on to make money off those movies. Not sure if it's good enough for the people who pay to watch these movies, but then again, it doesn't seem like anyone needs to care about consumers anymore anyway, so...the people who work on movies are in for a fight if they want to be treated like humans. 

The problem, for the rest of us, is that we're humans too. Well, not if you're reading this, because the only people who read this weblog are in fact robots. But the rest of us are humans. And for the first time since Africa, we are facing real competition.

Below is a report about the 2023 SAG-AFTRA labor story, and some good bits about how humans and robots are being positioned against each other in the labor market, and what that might mean for us in the future. It's written by Data and Society Institute (citation at the very bottom, and in-text references you'll just have to get for yourself from the document; because sorry sir this is a Wendy's). 

*SAG-AFTRA - Screen Actors Guild – American Federation of Television and Radio Artists
*Image credit: Gundam style mechabot made in japan - japantimes www.japantimes.co.jp


On Common Sense, Machine Learning and Big Data
Common sense, or a skewed perception of reality that perpetuates the status quo as normal, natural and unquestionable, is an expression of hegemonic power. The concept of common sense describes commonly held — yet nonetheless fragmented and heterogenous - knowledge that often goes unquestioned as fact (Gramsci,1926/1971). 
 
According to critical theorist Hito Steyerl's (2023) power analysis of machine learning technologies, the power of the owning class depends on its seizure of data. Thus, the discussion of for-profit technology, and speci!cally various applications that track, record, and classify user data, can never be liberatory, despite the claims of the companies, industries, and institutions promising safety, accessibility, efficiency, and sustainability (Bender and Hanna, 2025; Benjamin, 2019).

The “common sense” of AI, that is, the widely-held belief that AI is a foregone conclusion, functions as an articulation of hegemonic power. In this frame, we seek to understand how the labor movement can meaningfully intervene.

AI is not simply a discursive formation that stands as a “common sense” foregone conclusion, it also obfuscates large-scale, transnational coordination of resources, labor, and people who make up the infrastructures that are required for arti!cial intelligence. This matters because it broadens the base for possible coalition building to be mobilized in these “processes of subtraction” (Steyerl, 2023, p. 12).

Data and Society, 2026


See Figure 1 - The four strategies on the left negotiate with the common sense of AI, giving it power and weight, as these strategies work with AI as it is, instead of disengaging with the common sense of AI, and pushing these technologies to work that are commons-based or people-centered.

Robots in Human Clothing, ie The Corporate Flesh Engine
Amazon has long referred to their Mechanical Turk platform as artificial intelligence, but there have always been humans doing the often-underpaid work of classifying and sorting content of all types, increasingly in the Global South (Crawford, 2021; Gonzalez-Cabello et al., 2025). This hidden labor has been referred to as “ghost work” (Gray and Suri, 2019; Muldoon et al., 2024) and “human-fueled automation” (Irani, 2019), drawing attention to the people who power AI systems. 

Synthetic Performers (i.e., entirely digitally-produced performers created through generative AI). The [new negotiated contract] establishes guidelines around the creation and use of “digital replicas” and “synthetic performers.”

Digital replicas are digital reproductions of an actor's voice or likeness. The contract described two types of digital replicas: “employment-based digital replicas” and “independently created digital replicas.”

Employment-based digital replicas are those that are created during the actors’ physical participation in work through methods such as scanning, which can then be used to depict the actor in scenes they did not actually perform.

Independently created digital replicas are made without the actor's physical participation and can perform in scenes that they did not perform. The parameters of consent and compensation vary depending on the type of technology utilized. The guidelines for synthetic performers created through generative AI are less robust than those for digital replicas. Synthetic performers are entirely digitally-produced performers created through generative AI that do not resemble a recognizable actor and are not voiced by a person. The contract requires that studios who want to use a synthetic performer must notify and provide the union with opportunities to bargain over the usage of a synthetic performer in lieu of hiring a human performer. A document drafted by the union with frequently asked questions on AI notes that “for wholly synthetic assets, [studios] cannot use them without notifying the union and bargaining. Had we not done that, there was nothing stopping them from using these synthetic assets without anyone's consent.”

The contract also notes that if studios create a synthetic performer through prompting a generative AI system using a performer's name and their “principal facial feature” — the mouth, nose, eyes, or ears — that is recognizable, studios must bargain with the performer and obtain their consent.

However, for synthetic performers and independently created digital replicas, there are exceptions for consent with regards to uses protected by the First Amendment. A summary of the tentative agreement lists these exceptions as “comment, criticism, scholarship, satire or parody, use in a docudrama, or historical or biographical work.” In the aforementioned types of projects, studios do not need to obtain consent from performers to use their digital doubles.

--Source: Big Data & Society. Dis/engaging the ‘common sense’ of AI: Labor strategies 
from the 2023 SAG-AFTRA around data-driven technologies. Mar 2 2026. Emma May, Britt Paris and Serita Sargent, Rutgers School of Communication & Information.

Tuesday, March 25, 2025

Transmogrify My AI


AKA I Am a Man!

Leading AI chatbots show dementia-like cognitive decline in tests, raising questions about their future in medicine
Dec 2024, phys.org

Something about anthropomorphism - saying they have dementia, like saying they hallucinate, is assigning human-like qualities to a robot:

Researchers assessed the cognitive abilities of the leading, publicly available LLMs — OpenAI's ChatGPT versions 4 and 4o, Anthropic's Claude 3.5 "Sonnet", and Google's Gemini versions 1 and 1.5 — using the Montreal Cognitive Assessment test, widely used to detect cognitive impairment and early signs of dementia, usually in older adults. 

ChatGPT 4o achieved the highest score (26 out of 30), followed by ChatGPT 4 and Claude (25), with Gemini 1.0 scoring lowest (16).

The uniform failure of all large language models in tasks requiring visual abstraction and executive function highlights a significant area of weakness that could impede their use in clinical settings.

"Not only are neurologists unlikely to be replaced by large language models any time soon, but our findings suggest that they may soon find themselves treating new, virtual patients - artificial intelligence models presenting with cognitive impairment."

via Department of Neurology at Hadassah Medical Center Jerusalem, Hebrew University, Tel Aviv University: G Koplewitz: Age against the machine—susceptibility of large language models to cognitive impairment: cross sectional analysis, BMJ (2024). DOI: 10.1136/bmj-2024-081948



AI's next frontier: Selling your intentions before you know them
Dec 2024, phys.org

Sure it sounds scary, but isn't this what predictive analytics is all about? (And we've been doing that for years)

Forthcoming - "persuasive technologies" using "digital signals of intent" to predict your behavior in real time via Anthropomorphic AI agents. 

"We caution that AI tools are already being developed to elicit, infer, collect, record, understand, forecast, and ultimately manipulate and commodify human plans and purposes."

Again, "We caution that AI tools are already being developed to elicit, infer, collect, record, understand, forecast, and ultimately manipulate and commodify human plans and purposes."

via University of Cambridge's Leverhulme Center for the Future of Intelligence: Beware the Intention Economy: Collection and Commodification of Intent via Large Language Models, Harvard Data Science Review (2024). DOI: 10.1162/99608f92.21e6bbaa


Condé Nast, other news orgs say AI firm stole articles, spit out “hallucinations”
Feb 2025, Ars Technica

In February 2024, [generative AI company] Cohere announced that it would provide legal protection against intellectual property claims to its paying enterprise customers. This includes "full indemnification for any third party claims that the outputs generated by our models infringe on a third party's intellectual property rights," for Cohere "enterprise customers that comply with our guidelines and do not intentionally attempt to generate infringing content." (Note this is not a ruling like the Reuters case but just the beginning of the lawsuit.)

Release the copybot trolls!


New study identifies differences between human and AI-generated text
Feb 2025, phys.org

Just the stats ma'am: 

They show how LLMs write by prompting them with extracts of writing from various genres, such as TV scripts and academic articles. 

LLMs used present participle clauses at two to five times the rate of human text, as demonstrated in this sentence written by GPT-4o: "Bryan, leaning on his agility, dances around the ring, evading Show's heavy blows."

They also used nominalizations at 1.5 to two times the rate of humans, and GPT-4o uses the agentless passive voice at half the rate as humans. This suggests that LLMs are trained to write in an informationally dense, noun-heavy style, which limits their ability to mimic other writing styles.

The researchers also found that instruction-tuned LLMs have distinctive vocabularies, using some words much more often than humans writing in the same genre. For example, versions of ChatGPT used "camaraderie" and "tapestry" about 150 times more often than humans do, while Llama variants used "unease" 60 to 100 times more often. Both models had strong preferences for "palpable" and "intricate."

Can we just pause for a minute and recognize that we're saying "more often than humans do" as if we knew what universal human speech was like. All this talk about bias in the algorithms, certainly important because it can be amplified, but what about the bias in the base sets? What are the base data we're using to say what a "human" is like?

Also, as a native English speaker, I do recognize that non-natives tend to overuse present participles (like words ending in -ing), which may or may not have anything to do with this and the joke that 'AI is just three [people from underdeveloped communities] in a trenchcoat'. If you're not sure what I'm talking about, go listen to an Excel tutorial for a few minutes. ...

via Carnegie Mellon University: Alex Reinhart et al, Do LLMs write like humans? Variation in grammatical and rhetorical styles, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (2025). DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2422455122

Friday, October 4, 2024

Robots Using Robots

Sometimes you have to give it to these scientists, the stuff they come up with is pretty smart. 

Who wrote this? Engineers discover novel method to identify AI-generated text
Mar 2024, phys.org

First, an interesting note:
"Stubbornness" is when LLMs show a tendency to alter human-written text more readily than AI-generated text, and it happens because LLMs often regard AI-generated text as already optimal and thus make minimal changes.

Next, the purpose:
Raidar (geneRative AI Detection viA Rewriting) - identifies whether text has been written by a human or generated by AI or LLMs, without needing access to a model's internal workings. 

Finally, the clever part:
It uses a language model to rephrase a given text and then measures how many edits the system makes to the given text. Many edits mean the text is likely written by humans, while fewer modifications mean the text is likely machine-generated.

via Columbia University School of Engineering and Applied Science: Chengzhi Mao et al, Raidar: geneRative AI Detection viA Rewriting, arXiv (2024). DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2401.12970



Random robots are more reliable: New AI algorithm for robots consistently outperforms state-of-the-art systems
May 2024, phys.org

Maximum Diffusion Reinforcement Learning (MaxDiff RL) - an algorithm that encourages robots to explore their environments as randomly as possible in order to gain a diverse set of experiences; "designed randomness"; improves the quality of the data collected

If the robots move randomly, instead of some highly calculated, optimized trajectories, somehow the resulting data they collect on the world around them is better. Like when randomness is the base, it makes way better structures. I'm immediately thinking of watching a baby learn to move their body parts, or their vocal chords; underneath those first recognizable attempts is an endless iteration of random movements that are sometimes just now starting to get it right. 

via Northwestern McCormick School of Engineering: Maximum diffusion reinforcement learning, Nature Machine Intelligence (2024). DOI: 10.1038/s42256-024-00829-3

Post Script: It's funny to think of this, the MaxDiff RL, as an "algorithm", since it's kind of getting rid of any algorithms, that's the point here. When the algorithm is random, it's not an algorithm anymore; randomness is the anti-algorithm?


Researchers test AI systems' ability to solve the New York Times' connections puzzle
May 2024, phys.org

Chain of thought prompting:

The researchers found that explicitly prompting GPT-4 to reason through the puzzles step-by-step significantly boosted its performance to just over 39% of puzzles solved.

"Our research confirms prior work showing this sort of 'chain-of-thought' prompting can make language models think in more structured ways. Asking the language models to reason about the tasks that they're accomplishing helps them perform better."

via NYU Tandon School of Engineering: Graham Todd et al, Missed Connections: Lateral Thinking Puzzles for Large Language Models, arXiv (2024). DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2404.11730


New ransomware attack based on an evolutional generative adversarial network can evade security measures
Jun 2024, phys.org

GAN-based architectures consist of two artificial neural networks that compete against each other to generate increasingly "better" results on a specific task. 

You already know it as the way we get hyperrealistic image generation or convincing conversation from a robot, and it's now being used to make malware attacks more effective. 

These scientists tested a version of this attack-enhancing approach, and found their framework capable of bypassing the majority of available anti-virus systems.

via Texas A&M University and Ho Technical University: Daniel Commey et al, EGAN: Evolutional GAN for Ransomware Evasion, 2023 IEEE 48th Conference on Local Computer Networks (LCN) (2023). DOI: 10.1109/LCN58197.2023.10223320


New technique improves the reasoning capabilities of large language models
Jun 2024, phys.org

Their approach, called natural language embedded programs (NLEPs), involves prompting a language model to create and execute a Python program to solve a user's query, and then output the solution as natural language.

NLEPs also improve transparency, since a user could check the program to see exactly how the model reasoned about the query and fix the program if the model gave a wrong answer.

via MIT: Tianhua Zhang et al, Natural Language Embedded Programs for Hybrid Language Symbolic Reasoning, arXiv (2023). DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2309.10814

Friday, July 5, 2024

No Mystery Here


As a wet bag of twitching proteins, your biosignatures are unavoidable. Everything you do sends a signal, waiting for someone, something to recognize your existence, your intent, your fate. You are not a mystery; your every move, every decision, every thought and desire, they are all being broadcast, in myriad ways. You think that CIA agent has a superpower because she can tell that you're lying by looking at the micro-twitches on your face? Nothing. We are no match for what's coming. And if we don't become half robot very soon, the Anthropocene will be marked not by plutonium or "plastic rocks" but by the sudden disappearance of humans from the fossil record. Let's begin:

Eye movements can be decoded by the sounds they generate in the ear, study shows
Nov 2023, phys.org

Fucking "ear squeaks" - 

In 2018, Groh's team discovered that the ears make a subtle, imperceptible noise when the eyes move; the Duke team now shows that these sounds can reveal where your eyes are looking.

via Duke University: Stephanie N. Lovich et al, Parametric information about eye movements is sent to the ears, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (2023). DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2303562120



AI-powered satellite analysis reveals the unseen economic landscape of underdeveloped nations
Dec 2023, phys.org

The researchers used Sentinel-2 satellite images from the European Space Agency (ESA) that are publicly available. They split these images into small six-square-kilometer grids. At this zoom level, visual information such as buildings, roads, and greenery can be used to quantify economic indicators.

The key feature of their research model is the "human-machine collaborative approach," which lets researchers combine human input with AI predictions for areas with scarce data. In this research, 10 human experts compared satellite images and judged the economic conditions in the area, with the AI learning from this human data and giving economic scores to each image. The results showed that the Human–AI collaborative approach outperformed machine-only learning algorithms.

via KAIST Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology: Donghyun Ahn et al, A human-machine collaborative approach measures economic development using satellite imagery, Nature Communications (2023). DOI: 10.1038/s41467-023-42122-8


Artificial intelligence can predict events in people's lives, researchers show
Dec 2023, phys.org

Researchers have analyzed health data and attachment to the labor market for 6 million Danes in a model dubbed life2vec. Then they trained it, and asked for answers to general questions such as: 'death within four years'? 

Results are consistent with existing findings within the social sciences; for example, all things being equal, individuals in a leadership position or with a high income are more likely to survive, while being male, skilled or having a mental diagnosis is associated with a higher risk of dying.

In a way, this thing is sequencing the events of a person's life, and making a prediction the same way it can already look at the words in your prompt and produce what should be the expected response. 

via Technical University of Denmark, University of Copenhagen, ITU, and Northeastern University: Sune Lehmann, Using sequences of life-events to predict human lives, Nature Computational Science (2023). DOI: 10.1038/s43588-023-00573-5. 


Researchers develop algorithm that crunches eye-movement data of screen users
Feb 2024, phys.org

Hold onto your eyeballs 

Raw Eye Tracking and Image Ncoder Architecture (RETINA) can zero in on selections before people even made their decisions.

Can you read this and ask yourself on what planet you would ever want this?

The algorithm could be applied in many settings by all types of companies. For example, a retailer like Walmart could use it to enhance the virtual shopping experiences they are developing in the metaverse, a shared, virtual online world. Many of the VR devices people will use to explore the metaverse will have built-in eye tracking to help better render the virtual environment. With this algorithm, Walmart could tailor the mix of products on display in their virtual store to what a person will likely choose, based on their initial eye movements.

"Even before people have made a choice, based on their eye movement, we can say it's very likely that they'll choose a certain product," Wedel says. "With that knowledge, marketers could reinforce that choice or try to push another product instead."

The researchers are already working to commercialize the algorithm and extend their research to optimize decision-making.

"We think eye tracking will become available at very large scales"

via (get ready) University of Maryland's PepsiCo Chair in Consumer Science in the Robert H. Smith School of Business, as well as Tel Aviv University and New York University: Moshe Unger et al, Predicting consumer choice from raw eye-movement data using the RETINA deep learning architecture, Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery (2023). DOI: 10.1007/s10618-023-00989-7

AI Art - Affluent Gentleman w Money Surrounded by Envious People 2 - 2024

Study discovers neurons in the human brain that can predict what we are going to say before we say it
Feb 2024, phys.org

"Although speaking usually seems easy, our brains perform many complex cognitive steps in the production of natural speech - including coming up with the words we want to say, planning the articulatory movements and producing our intended vocalizations" 

New neural probes allow scientists to see certain neurons become active before a phoneme is spoken out loud.  

Neuropixel probes were first pioneered at Massachusetts General Hospital and are smaller than the width of a human hair, yet have hundreds of channels capable of simultaneously recording the activity of dozens or even hundreds of individual neurons"

via Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School: Arjun R. Khanna et al, Single-neuronal elements of speech production in humans, Nature (2024). DOI: 10.1038/s41586-023-06982-w


Improving traffic signal timing with a handful of connected vehicles
Feb 2024, phys.org

With GPS data from as little as 6% of vehicles on the road, the team used connected vehicle data, resulting in a 20% to 30% decrease in the number of stops at signalized intersections.

"While detectors at intersections can provide traffic count and estimated speed, access to vehicle trajectory information, even at low penetration rates, provides more valuable data including vehicle delay, number of stops, and route selection"

via University of Michigan Center for Connected and Automated Transportation: Xingmin Wang et al, Traffic light optimization with low penetration rate vehicle trajectory data, Nature Communications (2024). DOI: 10.1038/s41467-024-45427-4

Post Script: It occurs to me that we have here one of the use cases for connected services data collected by your car likely without you knowing about it, "The team used connected vehicle data insights provided by General Motors to test its system ...".


Smartphone app uses AI to detect depression from facial cues
Feb 2024, phys.org

It's really instructive how easy it is to fuck things up real good - instead of being a boon to mental health, this sounds like complete dystopia, where humans have lost all control over their lives and live in absolute subjugation to machines infinitely smarter than us and upon whom we are hopelessly reliant for everyday existence (the simple act of unlocking your phone...)  

MoodCapture took 125,000 images of 177 participants over 90 days. A first group of participants was used to program MoodCapture; if they answered the question, "I have felt down, depressed, or hopeless" from the eight-point Patient Health Questionnaire or PHQ-8, the program correlated self-reports of feeling depressed with specific facial expressions such as gaze, eye movement, positioning of the head, and muscle rigidity, and environmental features such as dominant colors, lighting, photo locations, and the number of people in the image.

The new study shows that passive photos are key to successful mobile-based therapeutic tools, Campbell said. They capture mood more accurately and frequently than user-generated photographs—or selfies—and do not deter users by requiring active engagement.

"These neutral photos are very much like seeing someone in-the-moment when they're not putting on a veneer, which enhanced the performance of our facial-expression predictive model," Campbell said.

via Dartmouth College: MoodCapture: Depression Detection using In-the-Wild Smartphone Images, arXiv (2024). DOI: 10.1145/3613904.3642680. arxiv.org/pdf/2402.16182.pdf


AI model trained with images can recognize visual indicators of gentrification
Mar 202,4 phys.org

Wow, science
The ten-year U.S. Census and the five-year American Community Survey are aggregated by census tract rather than building by building; not sufficiently fine-grained.

Now they're using visual cues of gentrification like new construction or renovations from Google Street View images for entire cities.

They got construction permits to identify where construction was planned, and extracted data on business upscaling (laundry to coffee shop; grocery to high-end restaurant) from a national business directory. Then, manually looking at pairs of images from 2007 through 2022 from the full Google Street View data set for three cities Oakland, Denver, and Seattle.

About 74% of the time the model predicted gentrification in the same places where gentrification had been previously found in other studies.

Interestingly, the model identified a significant number of what could be false positives—census tracts the model labeled as gentrifying that had been labeled non-gentrifying in the past. These could have been errors by the model, but when the researchers looked at paired images in those census tracts, they found what looked like gentrification—new apartment buildings and neighborhood upgrades.

The conclusion: Because the model leveraged granular street-level imagery, it seemed to be spotting early signs of gentrification that previous studies had missed.

via Stanford: Tianyuan Huang et al, CityPulse: Fine-Grained Assessment of Urban Change with Street View Time Series, arXiv (2024). DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2401.01107

Also: Tianyuan Huang et al, Detecting Neighborhood Gentrification at Scale via Street-level Visual Data, 2022 IEEE International Conference on Big Data (Big Data) (2023). DOI: 10.1109/BigData55660.2022.10020341

AI Art - Affluent Gentleman w Money Surrounded by Envious People 3 - 2024

Machine learning tools can predict emotion in voices in just over a second
Mar 2024, phys.org

As good as any human they say 

"Machine learning can be used to recognize emotions from audio clips as short as 1.5 seconds. Our models achieved an accuracy similar to humans when categorizing meaningless sentences with emotional coloring spoken by actors."

The researchers drew nonsensical sentences from two datasets - one Canadian, one German - which allowed them to investigate whether ML models can accurately recognize emotions regardless of language, cultural nuances, and semantic content.

Each clip was shortened to a length of 1.5 seconds, as this is how long humans need to recognize emotion in speech. It is also the shortest possible audio length in which overlapping of emotions can be avoided.

The emotions included in the study were joy, anger, sadness, fear, disgust, and neutral.

Deep neural networks filter sound components like frequency or pitch, for example when a voice is louder because the speaker is angry—to identify underlying emotions.

Convolutional neural networks scan for patterns in the visual representation of soundtracks, much like identifying emotions from the rhythm and texture of a voice.

This hybrid model merges both techniques.

But alas, good-as-human is not better-than-human:
"We wanted to set our models in a realistic context and used human prediction skills as a benchmark," Diemerling explained. "Had the models outperformed humans, it could mean that there might be patterns that are not recognizable by us." The fact that untrained humans and models performed similarly may mean that both rely on resembling recognition patterns, the researchers said.

via Center for Lifespan Psychology at the Max Planck Institute for Human Development: Implementing Machine Learning Techniques for Continuous Emotion Prediction from Uniformly Segmented Voice Recordings, Frontiers in Psychology (2024). DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1300996


Robotic face makes eye contact, uses AI to anticipate and replicate a person's smile before it occurs
Mar 2024, phys.org

Coexpression - when a person, or a robot, smiles at you while you're smiling at them.

Emo is a robot that anticipates facial expressions and executes them simultaneously with a human. It can predict a forthcoming smile about 840 milliseconds before the person smiles.

Emo could predict people's facial expressions by observing tiny changes in their faces as they begin to form an intent to smile.

via the Creative Machines Lab at Columbia University School of Engineering and Applied Science: Yuhang Hu et al, Human-robot facial coexpression, Science Robotics (2024). DOI: 10.1126/scirobotics.adi4724

Also: Rachael E. Jack, Teaching robots the art of human social synchrony, Science Robotics (2024). DOI: 10.1126/scirobotics.ado5755


Exploring the factors that influence people's ability to detect lies online
Apr 2024, phys.org

People were more suspicious of others if they had themselves lied during the game, but also when other players had reported holding a statistically unlikely card.

When compared to the predictions of an artificial, simulated lie detector, poor lie detection was associated with an over-reliance on one's own honesty (or dishonesty) and an under-reliance on statistical cues.

These findings imply that honest people may be particularly susceptible to scams, because they are the least likely to suspect a lie and thus detect a scam.

Moreover, as social media platforms use recommendation systems that feed people with more of the same content they like, these systems distort the likelihood of seeing certain information - fake news included.

People's natural reliance on statistical likelihoods to infer what is true thus will not work well in these contexts.

via University College London (UCL) and Massachusetts Institute of Technology: Sarah Ying Zheng et al, Poor lie detection related to an under-reliance on statistical cues and overreliance on own behaviour, Communications Psychology (2024). DOI: 10.1038/s44271-024-00068-7

Thursday, January 4, 2024

Not-bots, Fauxbots, Fleshbots and Semi-Sentience on the Rise


ChatGPT makes materials research much more efficient
Apr 2023, phys.org

"This isn't programming in the traditional sense; the method of interacting with these bots is through language," Morgan says. "Asking the program to extract data and then asking it to check if it is sure with normal sentences feels closer to how I train my children to get correct answers than how I usually train computers. It's such a different way to ask a computer to do things. It really changes how you think about what your computer can do."

via University of Wisconsin-Madison: Maciej P. Polak et al, Flexible, Model-Agnostic Method for Materials Data Extraction from Text Using General Purpose Language Models, arXiv (2023). DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2302.04914

Also: Maciej P. Polak et al, Extracting Accurate Materials Data from Research Papers with Conversational Language Models and Prompt Engineering—Example of ChatGPT, arXiv (2023). DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2303.05352

Image credit: In one of the first instances, phys.org uses a Stable Diffusion-generated image in the thumbnail, along with this statement: "This image was generated using Stable Diffusion, a text-to-image generator, using the prompt "researchers working with huge piles of data." -Dane Morgan and Maciej Polak, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 2023 [link]


New 'AI scientist' combines theory and data to discover scientific equations
Apr 2023, phys.org

The system rediscovered Kepler's third law of planetary motion, and produced a good approximation of Einstein's relativistic time-dilation law.

The new AI scientist—dubbed "AI-Descartes" by the researchers—joins the likes of AI Feynman and other recently developed computing tools that aim to speed up scientific discovery. At the core of these systems is a concept called symbolic regression, which finds equations to fit data. Given basic operators, such as addition, multiplication, and division, the systems can generate hundreds to millions of candidate equations, searching for the ones that most accurately describe the relationships in the data.

The system works particularly well on noisy, real-world data, which can trip up traditional symbolic regression programs that might overlook the real signal in an effort to find formulas that capture every errant zig and zag of the data. It also handles small data sets well, even finding reliable equations when fed as few as ten data points.

"In this work, we needed human experts to write down, in formal, computer-readable terms, what the axioms of the background theory are, and if the human missed any or got any of those wrong, the system won't work."

via IBM Research, Samsung AI, and University of Maryland Baltimore County: Combining Data and Theory for Derivable Scientific Discovery with AI-Descartes, Nature Communications (2023). DOI: 10.1038/s41467-023-37236-y


Researchers say AI emergent abilities are just a 'mirage'
Apr 2023, phys.org

"Previously claimed emergent abilities … might likely be a mirage induced by researcher analyses" 

Researchers contend that when results are reported in non-linear, or discontinuous, metrics, they appear to show sharp, unpredictable changes that are erroneously interpreted as indicators of emergent behavior, however an alternate means of measuring the identical data using linear metrics shows "smooth, continuous" changes that, contrary to the former measure, reveal predictable—non-emergent—behavior.

Large numbers getcha every time:

"The Stanford team added that failure to use large enough samples also contributes to faulty conclusions."

It's one of the easiest to spot when looking at the success of predictive powers, whether it's the weather, a sports bettor, or your financial advisor -- the law of large numbers makes us suck at identifying patterns. If you flip a perfect coin, there's a 50% chance of it landing on either heads or tails, which is what you would call a perfect chance, right down the middle. But if you flip the coin 10 times, you will probably not get 5 heads and 5 tails. You might have to flip it 100 times for that, or maybe even 10,000. And it depends on how many decimals you want to use, and if you start to get into millions and trillions of flips, then you'll have to cancel the variables in your system, like the weight of the respective sides of the coin, or the tendency for you hand to flip a certain way, or the prevailing winds, or patterns of seismic vibrations of the earth. 

People who understand very well the law of large numbers, or more likely people who don't udnerstand it and don't want to -- can do a good job convincing others of seeing whatever patterns they want, just by manipulating the metrics, like looking at performance from January to January instead of September to September, or 18 months instead of 12, or:

"The main takeaway," the researchers said, "is for a fixed task and a fixed model family, the researcher can choose a metric to create an emergent ability or choose a metric to ablate an emergent ability."

via Stanford University: Rylan Schaeffer et al, Are Emergent Abilities of Large Language Models a Mirage?, arXiv (2023). DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2304.15004

AI Art - A doctor use his stethoscope on a huge mechanical brain pink background 1 - 2023

Study finds source validation issues hurt ChatGPT reliability
May 2023, phys.org

Only about half of generated sentences were fully supported by citations, and one quarter of citations failed to support associated sentences.

Moreover, the team found citation recall and precision were inversely correlated with fluency and perceived utility. "The responses that seem more helpful are often those with more unsupported statements or inaccurate citations," they observed.

As a consequence, they concluded, "This facade of trustworthiness increases the potential for existing generative search engines to mislead users."

via Stanford University's Human-Centered AI research group: Nelson F. Liu et al, Evaluating Verifiability in Generative Search Engines, arXiv (2023). DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2304.09848


Online consumers at risk from 'intelligent' price manipulation, say experts
May 2023, phys.org

"Widespread use of intelligent algorithmics and dynamic pricing by online retailers, puts the public at risk of 'adversarial collusion"

More sophisticated algorithms can manipulate weaker algorithms and therefore collude together to increase prices for everyone, subtly undermine the competitiveness of online markets and harm consumers.

via University of Oxford: Luc Rocher, Adversarial competition and collusion in algorithmic markets, Nature Machine Intelligence (2023). DOI: 10.1038/s42256-023-00646-0


Ethical, legal issues raised by ChatGPT training literature
May 2023, phs.org

"Our work here has shown that OpenAI models know about books in proportion to their popularity on the web and the accuracy of such models is strongly dependent on the frequency with which a model has seen information in the training data."

Few if any details about data used to train the models are known to the public.

Also, science fiction and fantasy books dominate the list of memorized books, presenting a built-in bias on the nature of responses ChatGPT may provide. 

We should be thinking about whose narrative experiences are encoded in these models.

via University of California, Berkeley: Kent K. Chang et al, Speak, Memory: An Archaeology of Books Known to ChatGPT/GPT-4, arXiv (2023). DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2305.00118

Post Script: I'm more interested in the simple statistical reality of algorithms trained on a completely "wild" dataset. The internet as a dataset is not curated, it's not designed, it's neither tamed nor maintained in any way; it is completely wild. When you apply the current state of the art in machine learning to a wild dataset, you multiply the wild part. 

AI Art - A doctor use his stethoscope on a huge mechanical brain pink background 2 - 2023

AI: War crimes evidence erased by social media platforms
Jun 2023, BBC News

AI-powered church service in Germany draws a large crowd
Jun 2023, Ars Technica

New tool explains how AI 'sees' images and why it might mistake an astronaut for a shovel
Jun 2023, phys.org

CRAFT -- for Concept Recursive Activation FacTorization for Explainability -- was a joint project with the Artificial and Natural Intelligence Toulouse Institute.

One of the concepts associated with the tench (a type of fish) is the face of a white male, because there are many photos online of white male sports fishermen holding fish that look like tench. In another example, the predominant concept associated with a soccer ball in neural networks is the presence of soccer players on the field. 

One way to explain AI vision is through what's called attribution methods, which employ heatmaps to identify the most influential regions of an image that impact AI decisions. However, these methods mainly focus on the most prominent regions of an image—revealing "where" the model looks, but failing to explain "what" the model sees in those areas.

But with CRAFT we can see how the system is ranking the concepts. 

With the 'image of an astronaut was incorrectly classified as a shovel' problem, CRAFT showed that the neural network identified the concept of "dirt" commonly found in members of the image class "shovel" and the concept of "ski pants" typically worn by people clearing snow from their driveway with a shovel.

via Brown University's Carney Institute for Brain Science: Thomas Fel et al, CRAFT: Concept Recursive Activation FacTorization for Explainability (2023)

AI Art - A doctor use his stethoscope on a huge mechanical brain pink background 3 - 2023

Study says AI data contaminates vital human input
Jun 2023, phys.org

They dubbed this phenomenon "artificial artificial artificial intelligence."

(But you should know this is because of the already-in-use term for Mechanical Turks, dubbed "artificial artificial intelligence"; and although they used to provide human input are now relying on AI-generated content, thus the "artificial" hole of recursion.)

"It is tempting to rely on crowdsourcing to validate large language model outputs or to create human gold-standard data for comparison," Veselovsky said. "But what if crowd workers themselves are using LLMs … in order to increase their productivity, and thus their income, on crowdsourcing platforms?"

Based on a limited study of the use of large language models by workers at MTurk, Amazon's crowd sourcing operation, the EPFL researchers estimated that 33% to 46% of worker assignments were completed with the aid of large language models.

via École polytechnique fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), Lausanne, Switzerland: Veniamin Veselovsky et al, Artificial Artificial Artificial Intelligence: Crowd Workers Widely Use Large Language Models for Text Production Tasks, arXiv (2023). DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2306.07899

Post Script: Figure this one out flesh engine of the future!  "fringe benefits, french benefits, and friends with benefits" boy is that a good one.


Is it growing pains or is ChatGPT just becoming dumber?
Jul 2023, phys.org

"We don't fully understand what causes these changes in ChatGPT's responses because these models are opaque."

"Any results on closed-source models are not reproducible and not verifiable, and therefore, from a scientific perspective, we are comparing raccoons and squirrels." -Sasha Luccioni of the AI company Hugging Face

via Stanford and UC Berkeley: Lingjiao Chen et al, How is ChatGPT's behavior changing over time?, arXiv (2023). DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2307.09009