Showing posts with label complexity theory. Show all posts
Showing posts with label complexity theory. Show all posts

Thursday, January 14, 2021

Hear Ye


Network of sounds - New research reveals the magic secret of human networks
Aug 2020, phys.org

On Synchronization, and human synchronization in particular:

There's a bunch of violinists in the room, all with head phones on. They all hear their own violin, as well as those of others. But each person is connected to only some of the others, creating a complex communication network, think of a criss-crossing links-and-nodes graph. But then, they slow down some of the connections, so there is no universal timing for the music they play. Instead, they fall in and out of sync with each other, depending on who they're connected to.

And then, they delay all the players, making it impossible to sync with anyone, and so each player ends up cancelling-out what they hear from all but one, so they can try to sync with that one person. 

The main point of doing all this is so you can watch how people shift their attention from one player to the other, by the speed at which they're playing. (I think). And that means that ultimately, we can now study how a network functions when each node has it's own decision-making ability. A highway network full of autonomous car nodes, or a social network full of infobot nodes, or a society spreading a pandemic, of course. 

via the Weizmann Institute, along with Stony Brook: Synchronization of complex human networks, Nature Communications (2020). DOI: 10.1038/s41467-020-17540-7. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-17540-7


The rhythm of change - What a drum-beat experiment reveals about cultural evolution
Oct 2020, phys.org

This experiment is awesome. Santa Fe Institute and Dan Sperber, and you know what that means. It goes like this:

120 non-musicians are given a drum, and asked to play Telephone. You may know this as Chinese Whispers, or a transmission chain, or iterated learning. It's meant to mimic the propagation of information through culture. After being broken into groups, the first person copies a recording of a drumbeat rhythm, and the second person copies not the recording but the first person, and the third person copies the second person, and so on. (That's the game of Telephone.)

The rationale is that musical instruments are literally physically constrained by the socioeoconomic status of the culture making them, and so instruments can be an ideal denominator for comparing something as complex as culture.

And the outcome was that by placing the drums in different arrangements, they found clear differences in the "evolution" of the reiterated rhythms. This suggests that ecological factors, such as physical distance and motor activity, can affect the evolution of cultural products, and these effects can even be measured.

Motor constraints influence cultural evolution of rhythm, Proceedings of the Royal Society B (2020). doi: 10.6084/m9.figshare.c.5178247. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33109010/


War songs and lullabies behind origins of music
Nov 2020, phys.org

Auditory cheesecake and a new evolutionary theory of the origins of music:
Music comes from the need for groups to impress allies and foes, and for parents to signal their attention to infants.

The researchers also take issue with other music origin theories including that making music arose out of a need for social bonding, or that it is merely a fancy evolutionary byproduct with no real purpose—'auditory cheesecake' as the cognitive psychologist Steven Pinker once called it.
It's not about sexual selection; it's not about bonding; it's about the audience:
"If we study music in traditional societies, we see it used consistently to form political alliances," said Hagen.

Elaborate musical performances from war dances to military bands and even college marching bands, are often used to show a coalition's strength and impress outsiders. Hagen pointed out that many state visits include a performance by a national orchestra or military band. Studies also show that people can detect how well synchronized musicians are, and connect that higher synchrony to a coalition's strength.

"We need to invest a lot in infants since human babies are born helpless and need all sorts of help from the adults around them," said psychologist Samuel Mehr, director of Harvard's Music Lab. "The parent or caregiver needs a reliable way to signal to the infant that they are attending to them. But attention is a covert property of the mind. It's hard to determine if someone is actually paying attention to you." Directed song gives the infant a signal that the adult is paying attention to their needs, Mehr added. When singing, the adults cannot be talking to other people. The music also alerts the baby to the adult's physical location. "That's information that can't really be faked," he said.
Samuel A. Mehr et al, Origins of music in credible signaling, Behavioral and Brain Sciences (2020). DOI: 10.1017/S0140525X20000345. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32843107/

Post Script:
AI program writes music and lyrics
May 2020, phys.org
OpenAI this week announced the creation of an open source system called Jukebox that creates unique melodies and harmonies along with lyrics and vocalizations in the styles of popular artists from a large field of musical genres.

As an example, Jukebox does not yet compose larger musical themes such as choruses and repeating phrases.

 

Sunday, July 1, 2018

Sans Agency Humans

aka Sociothermodynamics


People get all bent out of shape thinking about the eminent takeover of artificial intelligence. Personally I think we're already robots, or rather, we've always been.

Bees in a hive, wolves in a pack, gas molecules in a prescribed volume. Do we really make decisions or does something else do it for us? And I don't mean God, I mean physics.

A nice string of headlines surfaced lately that alludes to this idea of humans being driven by forces well beyond our control:

Research finds tipping point for large-scale social change
Jun 2018, phys.org

Roughly 25% of people need to take a stand before large-scale social change occurs. This idea of a social tipping point applies to standards in the workplace and any type of movement or initiative.

How physics explains the evolution of social organization
Jun 2018, phys.org

A scientist at Duke University says the natural evolution of social organizations into larger and more complex communities that exhibit distinct hierarchies can be predicted from the same law of physics that gives rise to tree branches and river deltas. 
[Author] outlines how these seemingly disparate phenomena are actually connected through the constructal law of evolution in nature. Penned by Bejan in 1996, the law states that for a system to survive, it must evolve over time to increase its access to flow. [...] and the true nature of an innovation is simply a local design change that increases the efficiency of the distribution of a resource to the entire population. While the individual innovator may benefit greatly from the idea, the entire community also gains better access to that resource, which serves to reduce overall inequality.

Study of Google search histories reveals relationship between anti-Muslim and pro-ISIS sentiment in U.S.
Jun 2018, phys.org

Researchers suggest, targeting [Islamic] groups in countries such as the U.S. might be causing home-grown radicalization to occur. 
[They] found a common theme—in low income communities where there were a lot of anti-Muslim searches, there were also a lot of searches by people looking for more information about radical Islamic groups. Such communities, the researchers further noted, tended to be homogeneous in nature, mostly white, with few people of color. People from the Middle East, they point out, stand out in such communities. This finding, they claim, suggests that anti-Muslim activities such as discrimination and being targeted by government officials might actually be pushing some of those targeted people toward becoming extremists.

Adding a bit of moderation, we should note that humans lack agency in this context the way that smoking one cigarette takes 0.05 seconds off your life. Assertions like this come from absolutely huge, unimaginable numbers of people and variables working in concert and across time.

Our little brains can't handle it. This is why it's so hard to connect that one cigarette to lung cancer (especially in the face of nicotine addiction) and also why many if not most of us can't handle the possibility that neither we nor an omnipotent entity have control. It is instead the interaction of myriad forces, generating every-increasingly complex arrangements. Coincidentally, it is Liebniz bday (thanks google doodle); he is the guy that said things don't exist in themselves but only in their relation to others - an idea that has yet to be fully incorporated into our universal model of this thing we live in.

image source: valve steam controller

Thursday, October 11, 2012

Ladies and Gentlemen: The Number 45


When Anne Hathaway comes out with a new movie, Berkshire Hathaway's stocks go up.

That's an easy one to figure out (unless, of course, you don't know that robots now run Wall St).

The following story, however, is much more indicative of the nonsensical, illogical (by any human measure or current definition of the word) behavior of the nature of emergent phenomena as presented by complex algorithms, in this case, copyright bots.

BBC and others targeted by Microsoft copyright takedown request
8 October 2012
modified article:
Sites such as BBC, CNN, Wikipedia, and the U.S. Government were wrongly identified by software which crawls the web for attempts to illegally share Microsoft content, and requests that the sites be taken down due to copyright infringement.
The [copyright holder's takedown] request, sent in July, contained hundreds of addresses, and appeared to pinpoint articles and pages containing the number 45.
For example, a BBC page following Day 45 of the Olympic Torch Relay was on the takedown list, as was a Wikipedia article on Caesar's Civil War, which ended in 45BC.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-19869316
45?
Yes, 45.
And tell me again exactly what made Kony 2012 the most powerful virus of its kind to date.
(personally, I think it was the 4.20, not 45.)

http://networkaddress.blogspot.com/2012/08/algos.html
http://networkaddress.blogspot.com/2012/09/more-algos.html
http://networkaddress.blogspot.com/2012/09/socialbots.html

Post Script for good measure:


Mysterious Algorithm Was 4% of Trading Activity Last Week
John Melloy, 8 Oct 2012

A single mysterious computer program that placed orders — and then subsequently canceled them — made up 4 percent of all quote traffic in the U.S. stock market last week, according to the top tracker of high-frequency trading activity. The motive of the algorithm is still unclear.
http://www.cnbc.com/id/49333454