Showing posts with label relativity. Show all posts
Showing posts with label relativity. Show all posts
Monday, July 30, 2012
Relativistic Authenticity
It's like when you're an American looking for news about America on BBC. You know all big media these days is corrupt and manipulated and biased, but it is, nonetheless, done in the service of manipulating a specific population. BBC, then, can only spin so much of the full volume of data processing through their apparatus, (and in a way that does not exhibit a perceptible contradiction - in an imaginary newsmedia that spun all information relative to all potential viewers, the overall contradictions would cancel its legitmacy and believabilty), and so you have to ask, which data points would be more likely to be tweaked? Those points that are significant/meaningful to the mass British psyche, that's what. So as an American, if I want news that is less corrupt, relative to me, it makes sense that I would go to another country's national news-source? They aren't trying to brainwash me, I'm an American (sure they might like to, but at some point it becomes unreasonable to do so, for the reasons above). So isn't BBC then more authentic to me than CNN?
authetic
Sunday, June 24, 2012
You Love Right Angles
![]() |
| Robert Williams, Persuasion of Right Angles, 2007 |
You can tell me ‘til you’re blue in the face, but you brain
is not designed to see things as
they are.
This is an efficiency-of-vision in the way the brain sees;
most would call it misperception. I
wonder, however, if we can call it so, if we can see that the brain has been
designed to see this way. It’s not a mistake. Trying to seeing things as they are in the first place is the mistake.
Labels:
angle illusion,
illusion,
misperception,
relativity,
right angles,
subjectivity
Friday, May 25, 2012
Status Consumerism vs. Goods Consumerism
The link between material assets on the one hand, and status and power on the other, is not self-evident or given by the nature of things. The links are socially created and what we need to think out is what these links can become under the new dispensation. Material goods do still lead to power and status, but they are not the only path towards it. The allocation of position depends on the social system and not the economy.
Ernest Gellner on Self-Image
Plough, Sword and Book
U. of Chicago Press
1988
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)



