Showing posts with label self-replicate. Show all posts
Showing posts with label self-replicate. Show all posts

Saturday, April 12, 2025

The Mirror Looks Back


Mom horrified by Character.AI chatbots posing as son who died by suicide
Mar 2025, Ars Technica

First, her son dies "by suicide - allegedly manipulated by chatbots posing as adult lovers and therapists".

But then, shit I'll just copy this part "this is not the first time Character.AI has turned a blind eye to chatbots modeled off of dead teenagers to entice users...",  Tech Justice Law Project.

This reminds me of the Omegle problem: 'I'm being used as sex-baiting bot' on video chat site. Apr 2021, BBC News. https://www.bbc.com/news/technology-56668156



Dad demands OpenAI delete ChatGPT’s false claim that he murdered his kids
Mar 2025, Ars Technica

As an aside, a great comment by Ars Forum user Apple fanboy 101:
"Something that can't unlearn false information isn't intelligent."

High social media use linked to delusional disorders
Mar 2025, phys.org

I know this isn't AI, it's social media, but come on, it's the same thing:

This is a literature review of 2,500 publications on social media use and psychiatric disorders, and it found that delusions were by far the most prevalent type of psychiatric disorders related to high social media use, and in particular, these:  
  • narcissistic personality disorder (delusions of superiority)
  • erotomania (delusions that someone famous loves you)
  • body dysmorphic disorder (delusions of flaws in some part of one's body)
  • anorexia (delusions about body size)
The virtual worlds — coupled with social isolation in "real life" — create environments where people can maintain a delusional sense of self identity without scrutiny. Also, platforms sustain and exacerbate mental and physical delusions, by enabling self-presentation in self-promoting but inaccurate ways.

via Simon Fraser University: Nancy Yang et al, I tweet, therefore I am: a systematic review on social media use and disorders of the social brain, BMC Psychiatry (2025). DOI: 10.1186/s12888-025-06528-6

Sunday, March 23, 2025

Digital Double Definition in Doubt


As awareness of digital twins grows, so does its definition, as well as its warnings, but so does its results. We're right here in the middle between pre-hype and post-hype:

Digital twins of the Earth: Researchers are critical of the term
Dec 2024, phys.org

FYI - The Destination Earth project was launched in 2022 as a key pillar of the European Commission's efforts towards the Green Deal, and wants a digital simulation of the Earth. The German Federal Agency for Carthography and Geodesy is working on a digital, intelligent 3D image of Germany and the German federal state of Rhineland-Palatinate is running a digital "hydro-twin" project.

These scientists are trying to add to the conversation:
They point out the lack of a clear definition of the term "digital twin of the Earth," which may be misleading. "All digital representations of our planet are model representations. As such, they will always be detached from reality—as a map can never fully replicate the land it depicts" and "suggests that we can create a digital representation that allows us to stress-test the structural properties of the Earth system with any desired degree of accuracy and precision" and as that is not the case, "as every model is a simplification of reality, and its creation requires simplifying assumptions that will unavoidably lead to uncertainties." Also, "the creation of new models with higher resolutions will not necessarily lead to an improvement in knowledge and results; and new complex models need new methodologies that will enable researchers to apply them."

via Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz: Robert Reinecke et al, How to use the impossible map – Considerations for a rigorous exploration of Digital Twins of the Earth, Socio-Environmental Systems Modelling (2024). DOI: 10.18174/sesmo.18786

Image credit: The above image is a first, I believe, where the authors of a science paper used a generative network to make a press release thumbnail image for their article, which happens to be about the union of humans and AI. The credit is titled: "Credit: By the authors" [link] and it comes from the Carnegie Mellon Robotics Institute.


Digital twin research finds colon cancer cells can be reverted to normal cells
Dec 2024, phys.org

Results already, so we're in the next phase of the digital twin hype, where it's not hype anymore. 

via The Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology: Jeong‐Ryeol Gong et al, Control of Cellular Differentiation Trajectories for Cancer Reversion, Advanced Science (2024). DOI: 10.1002/advs.202402132

Monday, February 3, 2025

The Economy of Self Ingestion and Digital Replica Management


The self-replicate never sounded so good. 

Senate’s NO FAKES act hopes to make unauthorized “digital replicas” illegal
Aug 2024, Ars Technica

Nurture Originals, Foster Art, and Keep Entertainment Safe (NO FAKES) Act of 2024. [link]

The NO FAKES Act would create legal recourse for people whose digital representations are created without consent. It would hold both individuals and companies liable for producing, hosting, or sharing these unauthorized digital replicas, including those created by generative AI. Due to generative AI technology that has become mainstream in the past two years, creating audio or image media fakes of people has become fairly trivial, with easy photorealistic video replicas likely next to arrive.

To protect a person's digital likeness, the NO FAKES Act introduces a "digital replication right" that gives individuals exclusive control over the use of their voice or visual likeness in digital replicas. This right extends 10 years after death, with possible five-year extensions if actively used. It can be licensed during life and inherited after death, lasting up to 70 years after an individual's death. Along the way, the bill defines what it considers to be a "digital replica":

DIGITAL REPLICA - The term "digital replica" means a newly created, computer-generated, highly realistic electronic representation that is readily identifiable as the voice or visual likeness of an individual that - (A) is embodied in a sound recording, image, audiovisual work, including an audiovisual work that does not have any accompanying sounds, or transmission - (i) in which the actual individual did not actually perform or appear; or (ii) that is a version of a sound recording, image, or audiovisual work in which the actual individual did perform or appear, in which the fundamental character of the performance or appearance has been materially altered; and (B) does not include the electronic reproduction, use of a sample of one sound recording or audiovisual work into another, remixing, mastering, or digital remastering of a sound recording or audiovisual work authorized by the copyright holder.


Post Script:
Digital twin method can boost wireless network speed and reliability
Jul 2024, phys.org and written by Matt Shipman the original

"Systems can't put everything in edge caches, and storing too much redundant data on an edge server can slow down the server if the data are using too many computational resources. As a result, systems are constantly making decisions about which data packages to store and which data packages can be evicted.

The new edge caching optimization method, called D-REC, uses a digital twin to take real-time data from the wireless network and uses it to conduct simulations to predict which data are most likely to be requested by users. These predictions are then sent back to the network to inform the network's edge caching decisions. Because the simulations are performed by a computer that is outside of the network, this does not slow down network performance.

via North Carolina State University: Zifan Zhang et al, Digital Twin-Assisted Data-Driven Optimization for Reliable Edge Caching in Wireless Networks, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications (2024). DOI: 10.1109/JSAC.2024.3431575

Wednesday, January 15, 2025

Bodying in the 21st Century


Disney investigating massive leak of internal messages
Jul 2024, BBC News

Disney has confirmed it is investigating an apparent leak of internal messages by a hacking group, which claims it is "protecting artists' rights".

The group, Nullbulge, said it had gained access to thousands of communications from Disney employees and had downloaded "every file possible".

Nullbulge's website says the group targets anyone it believes is harming the creative industry by using content generated by artificial intelligence (AI), which it describes as "theft".

Nullbulge describes itself as "a hacktivist group protecting artists' rights and ensuring fair compensation for their work".

Partially related image credit: This is an image taken from an nj.com article on porch pirates in 2024, and is just a great example of terrible staged photos, which is what happens when we don't give the arts the respect it deserves.

Phantom data could show copyright holders if their work is in AI training data
Jul 2024, phys.org

"Taking inspiration from the map makers of the early 20th century, who put phantom towns on their maps to detect illicit copies, we study how injection of 'copyright traps'—unique fictitious sentences—into the original text enables content detectability in a trained LLM."

via Imperial College London: Matthieu Meeus et al, Copyright Traps for Large Language Models, arXiv (2024). DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2402.09363

Public Service Announcement: "AI companies are increasingly reluctant to share any information about their training data. While the training data composition for GPT-3 and LLaMA (older models released by OpenAI and Meta AI respectively) is publicly known, it is no longer the case for the more recent models GPT-4 and LLaMA-2."


Video game strike - Online games could be first to be hit
Aug 2024, BBC News

Members of union SAG-Aftra, which represents approximately 160,000 performers, recently staged a picket outside the offices of Warner Bros, one of 10 game companies negotiating with the union.
They say their offer gives workers "meaningful protections" but SAG-Aftra disagrees.

"AI technology lets these companies put your face, your voice, your body into something that you may not even have agreed to," says Duncan.


FBI busts musician’s elaborate AI-powered $10M streaming-royalty heist
Sep 2024, Benji Edwards for Ars Technica but originally reported from New York Times

Smith's scheme, which prosecutors say ran for seven years, involved creating thousands of fake streaming accounts using purchased email addresses. He developed software to play his AI-generated music on repeat from various computers, mimicking individual listeners from different locations. In an industry where success is measured by digital listens, Smith's fabricated catalog reportedly managed to rack up billions of streams.

To avoid detection, Smith spread his streaming activity across numerous fake songs, never playing a single track too many times. He also generated unique names for the AI-created artists and songs, trying to blend in with the quirky names of legitimate musical acts. Smith used artist names like "Callous Post" and "Calorie Screams," while their songs included titles such as "Zygotic Washstands" and "Zymotechnical."

...2018 when he partnered with an as-yet-unnamed AI music company CEO and a music promoter to create a large library of computer-generated songs.


New tool makes songs unlearnable to generative AI
Oct 2024, phys.org

Reminder: 
"Most of the high-quality artworks online are copyrighted, but these companies can get the copyrighted versions very easily. Maybe they pay $5 for a song, like a normal user, and they have the full version. But that purchase only gives them a personal license; they are not authorized to use the song for commercialization."

Companies will often ignore that restriction and train their AI models on the copyrighted work. 
...

HarmonyCloak - makes musical files unlearnable to generative AI models without changing how they sound to humans. [link

"Our idea is to minimize the knowledge gap [between new information and their existing knowledge] ourselves so that the model mistakenly recognizes a new song as something it has already learned. That way, even if an AI company can still feed your music into their model, the AI 'thinks' there is nothing to learn from it."

via Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science at University of Tennessee at Knoxville and Lehigh University: They will present their research at the 46th IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy (S&P) in May 2025.