^?
It’s funny, in a way, that there’s two sets of arrows on a
keyboard. Considering what a keyboard is, there’s no way we could have avoided
such a “quantum semiotics” (using quotes because I don’t know what that even
means, not because that’s what it’s called).
Sometimes when I talk to people, I come to the understanding
that they think I’m talking about the ‘character-arrows’(semantic), when I’m really
talking about the ‘command-arrows’(syntactic)
Because, I guess, after all you can’t really talk about the
command arrows; they’re made to put
you somewhere else, not talk about or refer
to somewhere else.
Is conversation to transfer information, or to modify cognition
by the process of the transfer of
information?
No comments:
Post a Comment